Violence became a strange word, meaning everything and nothing. Especially inciting violence is something problematic to define.

Don't fall into the pitfall to try being 100% angels, psychology doesn't work like that, it never worked and it will neuter people. Empirically proven

Seselj had several years long trial for "hate speech, inciting violence against Croats, fearmongering and similar stuff" - not guilty?! Man that guy was horrible, plus he had premilitary?! Still, not guilty.

Kabuga, Rwanda, radio calling to "kill the roaches", doxing of people, coordination of genocide, to here, there, kill all of them - guilty

Thus: Patriots, go to XX Street, kill YY, his family as well, than go to ZZ...

SERIOUS VIOLENCE, war crime

Man I hate those hypothetical, undefined Democrats and they should be purged, and that Antifa should run to the hills

Hague Court said it was too soft?!

The whole point of civil unrest or riots:

• here we are protesting with some force (just like BLM, Antifa, whoever).
• is police capable or willing of following the orders?
• if yes, ok, the guy in charge is still in charge.
• if not, why does his police and or army don't support him?!

If there is another representative of government, some contender, he calls the police/ army to follow him and protesters = call it revolution, coup, whatever

As you can see the results are:

• Democrats tried violence
• Police was not willing to response
• They made some sort of coup, knowing that police and army will do nothing

On the other side

• Republicans said no violence at all
• Made a rally?! to show what?
• Once the police decided to allow them to stop Democrats from winning...

Options were:

• for Trump to call insurrection act or similar
• for Democrats to call some Army or Police
• they would or would not follow, confronted with one million protesters
• Trump wins

What is he doing - I have no clue, and I have never seen anything like this

Violence became a strange word, meaning everything and nothing. Especially inciting violence is something problematic to define.

Don't fall into the pitfall to try being 100% angels, psychology doesn't work like that, it never worked and it will nutter people. Empirically proven

Seselj had several years long trial for "hate speech, inciting violence against Croats, fearmongering and similar stuff" - not guilty?! Man that guy was horrible, plus he had premilitary?! Still, not guilty.

Kabuga, Rwanda, radio calling to "kill the roaches", doxing of people, coordination of genocide, to here, there, kill all of them - guilty

Thus: Patriots, go to XX Street, kill YY, his family as well, than go to ZZ...

SERIOUS VIOLENCE, war crime

Man I hate those hypothetical, undefined Democrats and they should be purged, and that Antifa should run to the hills

Hague Court said it was too soft?!

The whole point of civil unrest or riots:

• here we are protesting with some force (just like BLM, Antifa, whoever).
• is police capable or willing of following the orders?
• if yes, ok, the guy in charge is still in charge.
• if not, why does his police and or army don't support him?!

If there is another representative of government, some contender, he calls the police/ army to follow him and protesters = call it revolution, coup, whatever

As you can see the results are:

• Democrats tried violence
• Police was not willing to response
• They made some sort of coup, knowing that police and army will do nothing

On the other side

• Republicans said no violence at all
• Made a rally?! to show what?
• Once the police decided to allow them to stop Democrats from winning...

Options were:

• for Trump to call insurrection act or similar
• for Democrats to call some Army or Police
• they would or would not follow, confronted with one million protesters
• Trump wins

What is he doing - I have no clue, and I have never seen anything like this