I'm sort of out of the loop since I'm not American and this whole stolen election circus was bumming me out, so help me out here please.

People that are defending the actions of the capital police say that the protester were potentially carrying concealed weapons. Given that the capital police officer that later died due to injuries sustained while “while physically engaging with protesters” wasn't shot, are you telling me that even "the most unhinged individuals", responsible for what the media wants to brand as "the darkest incident in Americas history" were armed and actually didn't shoot anyone even after a woman on their side was gunned down?

On top of that people want to use what happened as an argument against the second amendment? If anything it served as an endorsement of the second amendment by showing that your government is more trigger happy than even the people willing to risk going to prison to protest.

To me this is the equivalent of the media trying to vilify the people gunned down in the Boston Massacre or something like that.

It seems like there never was a real chance and Trump's succeeded simply because they didn't see it coming but the entire system is rigged in their favor and they control pretty much everything. A sad day when a cabal of sociopaths hold pretty much all the power in the USA, legit dystopian.

I'm sort of out of the loop since I'm not American and this whole stolen election circus was bumming me out, so help me out here please.

People that are defending the actions of the capital police say that the protester were potentially carrying concealed weapons. Given that the capital police officer that later died due to injuries sustained while “while physically engaging with protesters” wasn't shot, are you telling me that even "the most unhinged individuals", responsible for what the media wants to brand as "the darkest incident in Americas history" were armed and actually didn't shoot anyone even after a woman on their side was gunned down?

On top of that people want to use what happened as an argument against the second amendment? If anything it served as an endorsement of the second amendment by showing that your government is more trigger happy than even the people willing to risk going to prison to protest.

To me this is the equivalent of the media trying to vilify the people gunned down in the Boston Massacre or something like that.

It seems like there never was a real chance and Trump's succeeded simply because they didn't see it coming but the entire system is rigged in their favor and they control pretty much anything. The elections were bluntly rigged, the courts were part of it, they control the media, they control Big Tech, they control the deep state, the republican party sucks,

A sad day when a cabal of sociopaths hold pretty much all the power in the USA, legit dystopian.

I'm sort of out of the loop since I'm not American and this whole stolen election circus was bumming me out, so help me out here please.

People that are defending the actions of the capital police say that the protester were potentially carrying concealed weapons. Given that the capital police officer that later died due to injuries sustained while “while physically engaging with protesters” wasn't shot, are you telling me that even "the most unhinged individuals", responsible for what the media wants to brand as "the darkest incident in Americas history" were armed and actually didn't shoot anyone even after a woman on their side was gunned down?

On top of that people want to use what happened as an argument against the second amendment? If anything it served as an endorsement of the second amendment by showing that your government is more trigger happy than even the people willing to risk going to prison to protest.

To me this is the equivalent of the media trying to vilify the people gunned down in the Boston Massacre or something like that.

It seems like there never was a real chance and Trump's succeeded simply because they didn't see it coming but the entire system is rigged in their favor and they control pretty much anything. A sad day when a cabal of sociopaths hold pretty much all the power in the USA, legit dystopian.

I'm sort of out of the loop since I'm not American and this whole stolen election circus was bumming me out, so help me out here please.

People that are defending the actions of the capital police say that the protester were potentially carrying concealed weapons. Given that the capital police officer that later died due to injuries sustained while “while physically engaging with protesters” wasn't shot, are you telling me that even "the most unhinged individuals", responsible for what the media wants to brand as "the darkest incident in Americas history" were armed and actually didn't shoot anyone even after a woman on their side was gunned down?

On top of that people want to use what happened as an argument against the second amendment? If anything it served as an endorsement of the second amendment by showing that your government is more trigger happy than even the people willing to risk going to prison to protest.

To me this is the equivalent of the media trying to vilify the people gunned down in the Boston Massacre or something like that.

It seems like there never was a real chance and Trump's success simply because they didn't see it coming but the entire system is rigged in their favor and they control pretty much anything. A sad day when a cabal of sociopaths hold pretty much all the power in the USA, legit dystopian.

I'm sort of out of the loop since I'm not American and this whole stolen election circus was bumming me out, so help me out here please.

People that are defending the actions of the capital police say that the protester were potentially carrying concealed weapons. Given that the capital police officer that later died due to injuries sustained while “while physically engaging with protesters” wasn't shot, are you telling me that even "the most unhinged individuals", responsible for what the media wants to brand as "the darkest incident in Americas history" were armed and actually didn't shoot anyone even after a woman on their side was gunned down?

On top of that people want to use what happened as an argument against the second amendment? If anything it served as an endorsement of the second amendment by showing that your government is more trigger happy than even the people willing to risk going to prison to protest.

To me this is the equivalent of the media trying to vilify the people gunned down in the Boston Massacre.