The small amount of protection is offset by incorrect use of the mask, increased touching of the face, along with a false sense of protection; leading people to come within 6 feet of each other thinking they are safe. All these negatives increase the risk of contracting coronavirus. Additionally, the inspiratory airflow study concludes that masks can increase wearers risk of personal infection. Infected people spread the virus to others.
There are no randomized controlled trials showing mask use has a statistically significant benefit for others. Countries or states with extreme mask mandates do not universally benefit compared to those without. There is one large scale randomized controlled trial proving this statistical insignificance.
This study can be found here - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR1tjWP8B05V5WfkMaOmAJnkXbn6cvjfXp_IRvczx-SYmz6a8VS3NbsUNVA&
The small amount of protection is offset by incorrect use of the mask, increased touching of the face, along with a false sense of protection; leading people to come within 6 feet of each other thinking they are safe. All these negatives increase the risk of contracting coronavirus. Additionally, the inspiratory airflow study concludes that masks can increase wearers risk of personal infection. Infected people spread the virus to others.
There are no randomized controlled trials showing mask use has a statistically significant benefit for others. Countries with extreme mask mandates do not universally benefit compared to those without. There is one large scale randomized controlled trial proving this statistical insignificance.
This study can be found here - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR1tjWP8B05V5WfkMaOmAJnkXbn6cvjfXp_IRvczx-SYmz6a8VS3NbsUNVA&
The small amount of protection is offset by incorrect use of the mask, increased touching of the face, along with a false sense of protection; leading people to come within 6 feet of each other thinking they are safe. All these negatives increase the risk of contracting coronavirus. Additionally, the inspiratory airflow study concludes that masks can increase wearers risk on personal infection. Infected people spread the virus to others.
There are no randomized controlled trials showing mask use has a statistically significant benefit for others. Countries with extreme mask mandates do not universally benefit compared to those without. There is one large scale randomized controlled trial proving this statistical insignificance.
This study can be found here - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR1tjWP8B05V5WfkMaOmAJnkXbn6cvjfXp_IRvczx-SYmz6a8VS3NbsUNVA&
The small amount of protection is offset by incorrect use of the mask, increased touching of the face, along with a false sense of protection; leading to people to come within 6 feet of each other thinking they are safe. All these negatives increase the risk of contracting coronavirus. Additionally, the inspiratory airflow study concludes that masks can increase wearers risk on personal infection. Infected people spread the virus to others.
There are no randomized controlled trials showing mask use has a statistically significant benefit for others. Countries with extreme mask mandates do not universally benefit compared to those without. There is one large scale randomized controlled trial proving this statistical insignificance.
This study can be found here - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR1tjWP8B05V5WfkMaOmAJnkXbn6cvjfXp_IRvczx-SYmz6a8VS3NbsUNVA&
The small amount of protection is offset by incorrect use of the mask, increased touching of the face, along with a false sense of protection; leading to people to come within 6 feet of each other thinking they are safe. All these negatives increase the risk on contracting corona virus. Additionally, the inspiratory airflow study concludes that masks can increase wearers risk on personal infection. Infected people spread the virus to others.
There are no randomized controlled trials showing mask use has a statistically significant benefit for others. Countries with extreme mask mandates do not universally benefit compared to those without. There is one large scale randomized controlled trial proving this statistical insignificance.
This study can be found here - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR1tjWP8B05V5WfkMaOmAJnkXbn6cvjfXp_IRvczx-SYmz6a8VS3NbsUNVA&
The small amount of protection is offset by incorrect use of the mask, increased touching of the face, along with a false sense of protection; leading to people to come within 6 feet of each other thinking they are safe. Additionally, the inspiratory airflow study concludes that masks can increase wearers risk on personal infection. Infected people spread the virus to others.
There are no randomized controlled trials showing mask use has a statistically significant benefit for others. Countries with extreme mask mandates do not universally benefit compared to those without. There is one large scale randomized controlled trial proving this statistical insignificance.
This study can be found here - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR1tjWP8B05V5WfkMaOmAJnkXbn6cvjfXp_IRvczx-SYmz6a8VS3NbsUNVA&
The small amount of protection is offset by incorrect use of the mask, increased touching of the face, along with a false sense of protection; leading to people to come within 6 feet of each other thinking they are safe.
There are no randomized controlled trials showing mask use has a statistically significant benefit for others. Countries with extreme mask mandates do not universally benefit compared to those without. There is one large scale randomized controlled trial proving this statistical insignificance.
This study can be found here - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817?fbclid=IwAR1tjWP8B05V5WfkMaOmAJnkXbn6cvjfXp_IRvczx-SYmz6a8VS3NbsUNVA&