I haven't vetted this completely yet but, superficially, it looks good.

I got this from a Chinese dissident blog, hence the sidebar translation. (I can't read Chinese.)

Common tells of fraud would be different pixelation patterns indicating cut-n-paste or no-trails on the ends of the letters of the signature. I'm not seeing either anomolies.

Questionable is the word "book" in the phrase "Democratic Play book" is not capitalized. However, we say "Democrat" while they say "Democratic" which does lend credibility to the document.

Also, notice, "best wishes" is in all lower case. which might just be a slight, indicating she's not really wishing him the best, especially considering the other upper-case emphatic statements. There is a comma after the "best wishes" which is generally habitual. This doesn't appear to be an oversight so much as "writing between the lines".

The 2nd name of the signature is on an offset level but the wavering datum (bottom line of the chatacters) and the "delayed" dotting of the "i" suggests this IS authentic and that initially she meant to sign only "Nancy" (as if there were only one Namcy) but added the last name as an after thought. I don't know whether she signs most of her communiccations (to people whom she's especially familiar with) as just "Nancy".

These anomolies could be characteristic of the failing mind of a distracted or inebriated 80-year-old.

I haven't vetted this completely yet but, superficially, it looks good.

I got this from a Chinese dissident blog, hence the sidebar translation. (I can't read Chinese.)

Common tells of fraud would be different pixelation patterns indicating cut-n-paste or no-trails on the ends of the letters of the signature. I'm not seeing either anomolies.

Questionable is the word "book" in the phrase "Democratic Play book" is not capitalized. However, we say "Democrat" while they say "Democratic" which does lend credibility to the document.

Also, notice, "best wishes" is in all lower case. which might just be a slight, indicating she's not really wishing him the besy, especially considering the other upper case emphatic statements. There is a comma after the "best wishes" which is generally habitual. This doesn't appear to be an oversight so much as "writing between the lines".

The 2nd name of the signature is on an offset level but the wavering datum (bottom line of the chatacters) and the "delayed" dotting of the "i" suggests this IS authentic and that initially she meant to sign only "Nancy" (as if there were only one Namcy) but added the last name as an after thought.

These anomolies could be characteristic of the failing mind of a distracted or inebriated 80-year-old.

I haven't vetted this completely yet but, superficially, it looks good.

I got this from a Chinese dissident blog, hence the sidebar translation. (I can't read Chinese.)

Common tells of fraud would be different pixelation patterns indicating cut-n-paste or no-trails on the ends of the letters of the signature. I'm not seeing either anomolies.

Questionable is the word "book" in the phrase "Democratic Play book" is not capitalized. However, we say "Democrat" while they say "Democratic" which does lend credibility to the document.

Also, notice, "best wishes" is in all lower case. which might just be a slight, indicating she's not really wish him the besy, especially considering the other upper case emphatic statements. There is a comma after the "best wishes" which is generally habitual. This doesn't appear to be an oversight so much as "writing between the lines".

The 2nd name of the signature is on an offset level but the wavering datum (bottom line of the chatacters) and the "delayed" dotting of the "i" suggests this IS authentic and that initially she meant to sign only "Nancy" (as if there were only one Namcy) but added the last name as an after thought.

These anomolies could be characteristic of the failing mind of a distracted or inebriated 80-year-old.

I haven't vetted this completely yet but, superficially, it looks good.

I got this from a Chinese dissident blog, hence the sidebar translation. (I can't read Chinese.)

Common tells of fraud would be different pixelation patterns indicating cut-n-paste or no-trails on the ends of the letters of the signature. I'm not seeing either anomolies.

Questionable is the word "book" in the phrase "Democratic Play book" is not capitalized. However, we say "Democrat" while they say "Democratic" which does lend credibility to the document.

The 2nd name of the signature is on an offset level but the wavering datum (bottom line of the chatacters) and the "delayed" dotting of the "i" suggests this IS authentic and that initially she meant to sign only "Nancy" (as if there were only one Namcy) but added the last name as an after thought.

Both of these anomolies could be characteristic of the failing mind of an 80-year-old.

I haven't vetted this complrtely yet but, superficially, it looks good.

I got this from a Chinese dissident blog, hence the sidebar translation. (I can't read Chinese.)

Common tells of fraud would be different pixelation patterns indicating cut-n-paste or no-trails on the ends of the letters of the signature. I'm not seeing either anomolies.

Questionable is the word "book" in the phrase "Democratic Play book" is not capitalized. However, we say "Democrat" while they say "Democratic" ehichbdoes lend credibility to the document.

The 2nd name of the signature is on an offset level but the wavering datum (bottom line of the chatacters) and the "delayed" dotting of the "i" suggests this IS authentic and that initially she meant to sign only "Nancy" (as if there were only one Namcy) but added the last name as an after thought.

Both of these anomolies could be characteristic of the failing mind of an 80-year-old.

I haven't vetted this complrtely yet but, superficially, it looks good.

I got this from a Chinese dissident blog, hence the sidebar translation. (I can't read Chinese.)

Common tells of fraud would be different pixelation patterns indicating cut-n-paste or no-trails on the ends of the letters of the signature. I'm not seeing either anomoly.

Questionable is the word "book" in the phrase "Democratic Play book" is not capitalized. However, we say "Democrat" while they say "Democratic" ehichbdoes lend credibility to the document.

The 2nd name of the signature is on an offset level but the wavering datum (bottom line of the chatacters) and the "delayed" dotting of the "i" suggests this IS authentic and that initially she meant to sign only "Nancy" (as if there were only one Namcy) but added the last name as an after thought.

Both of these anomolies could be characteristic of the failing mind of an 80-year-old.