No injury (crime) has been commited yet was the court's argument. Gohmert’s and Sidney Powell, were rejected in the high court and in both the district and circuit court levels. The application argued that under the U.S. Constitution, the vice president could “count elector votes certified by a state’s executive, or he can prefer a competing slate of duly qualified electors.”

“He may ignore all electors from a certain state. That is the power bestowed upon him by the Constitution,” the application stated.

Even Trump spoke on this. I do not believe my earlier reply is in error, fren. :)

No injury (crime) has been commited yet was the court's argument. Gohmert’s and Sidney Powell, were rejected in the high court and in both the district and circuit court levels. The application argued that under the U.S. Constitution, the vice president could “count elector votes certified by a state’s executive, or he can prefer a competing slate of duly qualified electors.”

“He may ignore all electors from a certain state. That is the power bestowed upon him by the Constitution,” the application stated.

Even Trump spoke on this. I do not belive my earlier reply is in error, fren. :)

No injury (crime) has been commited yet was the court's argument. Gohmert’s and Sidney Powell, were rejected in the high court and in both the district and circuit court levels. The application argued that under the U.S. Constitution, the vice president could “count elector votes certified by a state’s executive, or he can prefer a competing slate of duly qualified electors.”

“He may ignore all electors from a certain state. That is the power bestowed upon him by the Constitution,” the application stated.

Even Trump spoke on this. I do not belive my post is in error, fren. :)