They were recounting the same faulty ballots.

Machine error rates caused an excessive amount of ballots to be passed on to adjudicators - PEOPLE who then "determine the voter's intent" and fill out a new ballot. The original ballot that couldn't be scanned by the tabulator is tossed. Acceptable error rate on these machines is .0008%. So why all the adjudicating? Once a rejected ballot is sent to adjudication, two things could have happened: 1. Humans then filled out ballots heavily in favor of Biden. This would explain the large number of biden only ballots, with no down votes. They didn't have time to fill out anything but the "biden bubble." and/or 2. Fake, preprinted ballots were injected into the system to replace the rejected ballot. This would explain the ballots with repeated "perfect ellipses" and lack of folds that witnesses testified to seeing.

In Antrim County, the machine error rate was 68%: https://www.scribd.com/document/488080093/Antrim-Michigan-Forensics-Report-121320-PRELIMINARY?secret_password=6tgofj7cUYx1kQwElves#from_embed

In Georgia, machine error was caused by faulty printing of the ballots (bar codes, etc.) Jovan Pulitzer is the expert on this one. Richard Barron, director of elections of Fulton County, Georgia, said in a press conference on the evening of Nov. 4 that his team had already adjudicated 106,000 ballots out of 113,130 ballots scanned that day, and “those results are already posted.” That's a similar error rate as Antrim County, roughly 70%.

There may also be a similar error rate on the machines there; we don't know because no one would allow a forensic audit. The only place this was allowed to be done was Antrim County. This is why all we wanted was a forensic audit of the machines and ballots!

Nothing would show up in the recount because there was nothing technically fake or wrong about the final ballots. It's how they came into being - filled out by humans, and/or preprinted fake ballots - when the machine purposely rejected the originals at extremely high error rates that is in question.

They were recounting the same faulty ballots.

Machine error rates caused an excessive amount of ballots to be passed on to adjudicators - PEOPLE who then "determine the voter's intent" and fill out a new ballot. The original ballot that couldn't be scanned by the tabulator is tossed. Acceptable error rate on these machines is .0008%. So why all the adjudicating? Once a rejected ballot is sent to adjudication, two things could have happened: 1. Humans then filled out ballots heavily in favor of Biden. This would explain the large number of biden only ballots, with no down votes. They didn't have time to fill out anything but the "biden bubble." and/or 2. Fake, preprinted ballots were injected into the system to replace the rejected ballot. This would explain the ballots with repeated "perfect ellipses" and lack of folds that witnesses testified to seeing.

In Antrim County, the machine error rate was 68%: https://www.scribd.com/document/488080093/Antrim-Michigan-Forensics-Report-121320-PRELIMINARY?secret_password=6tgofj7cUYx1kQwElves#from_embed

In Georgia, machine error was caused by faulty printing of the ballots (bar codes, etc.) Jovan Pulitzer is the expert on this one. Richard Barron, director of elections of Fulton County, Georgia, said in a press conference on the evening of Nov. 4 that his team had already adjudicated 106,000 ballots out of 113,130 ballots scanned that day, and “those results are already posted.”

There may also be a similar error rate on the machines there; we don't know because no one would allow a forensic audit. The only place this was allowed to be done was Antrim County. This is why all we wanted was a forensic audit of the machines and ballots!

Nothing would show up in the recount because there was nothing technically fake or wrong about the final ballots. It's how they came into being - filled out by humans, and/or preprinted fake ballots - when the machine purposely rejected the originals at extremely high error rates that is in question.

They were recounting the same faulty ballots.

Machine error rates caused an excessive amount of ballots to be passed on to adjudicators - PEOPLE who then "determine the voter's intent" and fill out a new ballot. The original ballot that couldn't be scanned by the tabulator is tossed. Acceptable error rate on these machines is .0008%. So why all the adjudicating? Once a rejected ballot is sent to adjudication, two things could have happened: 1. Humans then filled out ballots heavily in favor of Biden. This would explain the large number of biden only ballots, with no down votes. They didn't have time to fill out anything but the "biden bubble." and/or 2. Fake, preprinted ballots were injected into the system to replace the rejected ballot. This would explain the ballots with "perfect ellipses" that witnesses testified to seeing.

In Antrim County, the machine error rate was 68%: https://www.scribd.com/document/488080093/Antrim-Michigan-Forensics-Report-121320-PRELIMINARY?secret_password=6tgofj7cUYx1kQwElves#from_embed

In Georgia, machine error was caused by faulty printing of the ballots (bar codes, etc.) Jovan Pulitzer is the expert on this one. Richard Barron, director of elections of Fulton County, Georgia, said in a press conference on the evening of Nov. 4 that his team had already adjudicated 106,000 ballots out of 113,130 ballots scanned that day, and “those results are already posted.”

There may also be a similar error rate on the machines there; we don't know because no one would allow a forensic audit. The only place this was allowed to be done was Antrim County. This is why all we wanted was a forensic audit of the machines and ballots!

Nothing would show up in the recount because there was nothing technically fake or wrong about the final ballots. It's how they came into being - filled out by humans when the machine purposely rejected the originals at extremely high error rates - that is in question.

They were recounting the same faulty ballots.

Machine error rates caused an excessive amount of ballots to be passed on to adjudicators - PEOPLE who then "determine the voter's intent" and fill out a new ballot. The original ballot that couldn't be scanned by the tabulator is tossed. Acceptable error rate on these machines is .0008%. So why all the adjudicating?

In Antrim County, the machine error rate was 68%: https://www.scribd.com/document/488080093/Antrim-Michigan-Forensics-Report-121320-PRELIMINARY?secret_password=6tgofj7cUYx1kQwElves#from_embed

In Georgia, machine error was caused by faulty printing of the ballots (bar codes, etc.) Jovan Pulitzer is the expert on this one. Richard Barron, director of elections of Fulton County, Georgia, said in a press conference on the evening of Nov. 4 that his team had already adjudicated 106,000 ballots out of 113,130 ballots scanned that day, and “those results are already posted.”

There may also be a similar error rate on the machines there; we don't know because no one would allow a forensic audit. The only place this was allowed to be done was Antrim County. This is why all we wanted was a forensic audit of the machines and ballots!

Nothing would show up in the recount because there was nothing technically fake or wrong about the final ballots. It's how they came into being - filled out by humans when the machine purposely rejected the originals at extremely high error rates - that is in question.

They were recounting the same faulty ballots.

Machine error rates caused an excessive amount of ballots to be passed on to adjudicators - PEOPLE who then "determine the voter's intent" and fill out a new ballot. The original ballot that couldn't be scanned by the tabulator is tossed. Acceptable error rate on these machines is .0008%. So why all the adjudicating?

In Antrim County, the machine error rate was 68%: https://www.scribd.com/document/488080093/Antrim-Michigan-Forensics-Report-121320-PRELIMINARY?secret_password=6tgofj7cUYx1kQwElves#from_embed

In Georgia, machine error was caused by faulty printing of the ballots (bar codes, etc.) Jovan Pulitzer is the expert on this one. Richard Barron, director of elections of Fulton County, Georgia, said in a press conference on the evening of Nov. 4 that his team had already adjudicated 106,000 ballots out of 113,130 ballots scanned that day, and “those results are already posted.”

Nothing would show up in the recount because there was nothing technically fake or wrong about the final ballots. It's how they came into being - filled out by humans when the machine purposely rejected the originals at extremely high error rates - that is in question.