Just simple laws of physics here.. How can a building topple in on itself, in near free fall, when the affected mass aka the burning building is less than one fifth of the entire mass of the building?

Physics will point out that every force has an equal and opposite direction. In this case, it is inertia and resistance counter-acting on the collapsing structure.

Physics will say it is simply not possible that a steel building could fall in on itself at free-fall, as if there was no resistance.

Furthermore, on laws of physics regarding momentum and gravitational potential energy of an object, there is no way a building could collapse whilst building momentum in the manner that WTC collapsed. Infact, every floor will be acting as a counter toward the collapsing structure and it will SLOW down the collapse, not speed it up.. lol.

Everything about the collapse and the official report being told simply defies the laws of physics and our understanding of the world.. it makes absolutely zero sense. No steel and concrete building on fire, in modern day history has ever collapsed on itself in free-fall speed. Ever. Except WTC.

One of the only ways that a building can collapse in this manner, is if the resistance force is removed. Demolition is one way of removing this force.. and hence, why demolition is the only way a building can collapse on itself with near free fall speed. The towers and WTC 7 all came down in the very same manner..

it belongs in the highly suspicious category. Furthermore, the investigation conducted was shoddy as fuck. All of the evidence such as the steel was quickly removed from site and melted down.. The FEMA report never even looked into the theory that demolitions or foul play. AND they closed the investigation down after 'running out of funding.'..

Imagine that. We went to trillion dollar war, lost thousands of american lives and caused destruction of a few middle eastern countries over the collapse of these building and the excuse for not getting to the bottom of it was because they 'ran out of money'. What the actual fuck..

Just simple laws of physics here.. How can a building topple in on itself, in near free fall, when the affected mass aka the burning building is less than one fifth of the entire mass of the building?

Physics will point out that every force has an equal and opposite direction. In this case, it is inertia and resistance counter-acting on the collapsing structure.

Physics will say it is simply not possible that a steel building could fall in on itself at free-fall, as if there was no resistance.

Furthermore, on laws of physics regarding momentum and gravitational potential energy of an object, there is no way a building could collapse whilst building momentum in the manner that WTC collapsed. Infact, every floor will be acting as a counter toward the collapsing structure and it will SLOW down the collapse, not speed it up.. lol.

Everything about the collapse and the official report being told simply defies the laws of physics and our understanding of the world.. it makes absolutely zero sense.

One of the only ways that a building can collapse in this manner, is if the resistance force is removed. Demolition is one way of removing this force.. and hence, why demolition is the only way a building can collapse on itself with near free fall speed. The towers and WTC 7 all came down in the very same manner..

it belongs in the highly suspicious category. Furthermore, the investigation conducted was shoddy as fuck. All of the evidence such as the steel was quickly removed from site and melted down.. The FEMA report never even looked into the theory that demolitions or foul play. AND they closed the investigation down after 'running out of funding.'..

Imagine that. We went to trillion dollar war, lost thousands of american lives and caused destruction of a few middle eastern countries over the collapse of these building and the excuse for not getting to the bottom of it was because they 'ran out of money'. What the actual fuck..

Just simple laws of physics here.. How can a building topple in on itself, in near free fall, when the affected mass aka the burning building is less than one fifth of the entire mass of the building?

Physics will point out that every force has an equal and opposite direction. In this case, it is inertia and resistance counter-acting on the collapsing structure.

Physics will say it is simply not possible that a steel building could fall in on itself at free-fall, as if there was no resistance.

Furthermore, on laws of physics regarding momentum and gravitational potential of an object, there is no way a building could collapse whilst building momentum in the manner that WTC collapsed. Infact, every floor will be acting as a counter toward the collapsing structure and it will SLOW down the collapse, not speed it up.. lol.

Everything about the collapse and the official report being told simply defies the laws of physics and our understanding of the world.. it makes absolutely zero sense.

One of the only ways that a building can collapse in this manner, is if the resistance force is removed. Demolition is one way of removing this force.. and hence, why demolition is the only way a building can collapse on itself with near free fall speed. The towers and WTC 7 all came down in the very same manner..

it belongs in the highly suspicious category. Furthermore, the investigation conducted was shoddy as fuck. All of the evidence such as the steel was quickly removed from site and melted down.. The FEMA report never even looked into the theory that demolitions or foul play. AND they closed the investigation down after 'running out of funding.'..

Imagine that. We went to trillion dollar war, lost thousands of american lives and caused destruction of a few middle eastern countries over the collapse of these building and the excuse for not getting to the bottom of it was because they 'ran out of money'. What the actual fuck..

Just simple laws of physics here.. How can a building topple in on itself, in near free fall, when the affected mass aka the burning building is less than one fifth of the entire mass of the building?

Physics will point out that every force has an equal and opposite direction. In this case, it is inertia and resistance counter-acting on the collapsing structure.

Physics will say it is simply not possible that a steel building could fall in on itself at free-fall, as if there was no resistance.

Furthermore, on laws of physics regarding momentum and gravitational potential of an object, there is no way a building could collapse whilst building momentum in the manner that WTC collapsed. Infact, every floor will be acting as a counter toward the collapsing structure and it will SLOW down the collapse, not speed it up.. lol.

One of the only ways that a building can collapse in this manner, is if the resistance force is removed. Demolition is one way of removing this force.. and hence, why demolition is the only way a building can collapse on itself with near free fall speed. The towers and WTC 7 all came down in the very same manner..

it belongs in the highly suspicious category. Furthermore, the investigation conducted was shoddy as fuck. All of the evidence such as the steel was quickly removed from site and melted down.. The FEMA report never even looked into the theory that demolitions or foul play. AND they closed the investigation down after 'running out of funding.'..

Imagine that. We went to trillion dollar war, lost thousands of american lives and caused destruction of a few middle eastern countries over the collapse of these building and the excuse for not getting to the bottom of it was because they 'ran out of money'. What the actual fuck..

Just simple laws of physics here.. How can a building topple in on itself, in near free fall, when the affected mass aka the burning building is less than one fifth of the entire mass of the building?

Physics will point out that every force has an equal and opposite direction. In this case, it is inertia and resistance counter-acting on the collapsing structure.

Physics will say it is simply not possible that a steel building could fall in on itself at free-fall, as if there was no resistance.

One of the only ways that a building can collapse in this manner, is if the resistance force is removed. Demolition is one way of removing this force.. and hence, why demolition is the only way a building can collapse on itself with near free fall speed. The towers and WTC 7 all came down in the very same manner..

it belongs in the highly suspicious category. Furthermore, the investigation conducted was shoddy as fuck. All of the evidence such as the steel was quickly removed from site and melted down.. The FEMA report never even looked into the theory that demolitions or foul play. AND they closed the investigation down after 'running out of funding.'..

Imagine that. We went to trillion dollar war, lost thousands of american lives and caused destruction of a few middle eastern countries over the collapse of these building and the excuse for not getting to the bottom of it was because they 'ran out of money'. What the actual fuck..

Just simple laws of physics here.. How can a building topple in on itself, in near free fall, when the affected mass aka the burning building is less than one fifth of the entire mass of the building?

Physics will point out that every force has an equal and opposite direction. In this case, it is inertia and resistance counter-acting on the collapsing structure.

Physics will say it is simply not possible that a steel building could fall in on itself at free-fall, as if there was no resistance.

One of the only ways that a building can collapse in this manner, is if the resistance force is removed. Demolition is one way of removing this force.. and hence, why demolition is the only way a building can collapse on itself with near free fall speed. The towers and WTC 7 all came down in the very same manner..