1. The very first plane to hit was AAL11 which was a straight-in approach, without any maneuvers. u/prayinpede fucking lied that it took them "23 attempts" to do. It would've taken literally one - you aim directly at it.

2. You mongoloids will always doubt thousands of experts but always believe anyone who claims to be one who supports your bullshit. Every fucking pilot in the world could disagree and you'll cling to your one anecdote, and then fluff up their credentials in a pathetic 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy. FlYiNg CoMbAt MiSsIoNs In ViEtNaM?!?!! OmG!!!!!!1!one! Oh, we can play that game: None of the aircraft involved were 727s or 747s, so this fucking Boomer's credentials mean nothing. There. That's how it works, right?

3. You will latch onto bullshit that makes your theories make LESS sense, not MORE. What the fuck is the implication that these flight paths were impossible? We literally have video of them hitting the towers. What, was this a fucking hologram projected onto some kind of different plane? Is that what the suggestion here is?

4. You invent explanations in your head without any research, and then spend your lives cherrypicking "evidence" to prove it. Anything that contradicts you is literally discarded outright. And you'll believe anything that supports you, no matter how fucking flimsy or how much non-proof there is for it. In this case, some faggot Boomer shares a secondhand story about a fictional instructor claiming the flight paths were impossible.

It's funny how you shitheads will "question everything", yet I'm supposed to take it on nothing but FAITH that this little anecdote, that he provided zero proof ever happened, has no evidence that is true, and based on the way he told the story was clearly secondhand, is true? So I'm allowed to question the official narrative, but not the shit that some hentai-jerking obese blob working at Arby's spews onto the internet?

I thought you were "looking for answers" and "just asking questions", what part of his typed-at-a-4th-grade-level little fairy tale there was so compelling that you think any part of it was fucking true?

Was it the part where it makes absolutely zero sense, or did you somehow not manage to think about what the implication could possibly be that these maneuvers are impossible? I thought you conspiracy theorist folks were the smartest people on the planet, smarter than literally anyone who plotted 9/11, and you didn't even consider that?

1. The very first plane to hit was AAL11 which was a straight-in approach, without any maneuvers. u/prayinpede fucking lied that it took them "23 attempts" to do. It would've taken literally one - you aim directly at it.

2. You mongoloids will always doubt thousands of experts but always believe anyone who claims to be one who supports your bullshit. Every fucking pilot in the world could disagree and you'll cling to your one anecdote, and then fluff up their credentials in a pathetic 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy. FlYiNg CoMbAt MiSsIoNs In ViEtNaM?!?!! OmG!!!!!!1!one

3. You will latch onto bullshit that makes your theories make LESS sense, not MORE. What the fuck is the implication that these flight paths were impossible? We literally have video of them hitting the towers. What, was this a fucking hologram projected onto some kind of different plane? Is that what the fucking implication here is?

4. You invent explanations in your head without any research, and then spend your lives cherrypicking "evidence" to prove it. Anything that contradicts you is literally discarded outright. And you'll believe anything that supports you, no matter how fucking flimsy or how much non-proof there is for it. In this case, some faggot Boomer shares a secondhand story about a fictional instructor claiming the flight paths were impossible.

It's funny how you shitheads will "question everything", yet I'm supposed to take it on nothing but FAITH that this little anecdote, that he provided zero proof ever happened, has no evidence that is true, and based on the way he told the story was clearly secondhand, is true? So I'm allowed to question the official narrative, but not the shit that some hentai-jerking obese blob working at Arby's spews onto the internet?

I thought you were "looking for answers" and "just asking questions", what part of his typed-at-a-4th-grade-level little fairy tale there was so compelling that you think any part of it was fucking true?

Was it the part where it makes absolutely zero sense?

1. The very first plane to hit was AAL11 which was a straight-in approach, without any maneuvers. u/prayinpede fucking lied that it took them "23 attempts" to do. It would've taken literally one - you aim directly at it.

2. You mongoloids will always doubt thousands of experts but always believe anyone who claims to be one who supports your bullshit. Every fucking pilot in the world could disagree and you'll cling to your one anecdote, and then fluff up their credentials in a pathetic 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy. FlYiNg CoMbAt MiSsIoNs In ViEtNaM?!?!! OmG!!!!!!1!one

3. You will latch onto bullshit that makes your theories make LESS sense, not MORE. What the fuck is the implication that these flight paths were impossible? We literally have video of them hitting the towers. What, was this a fucking hologram projected onto some kind of different plane? Is that what the fucking implication here is?

4. You invent explanations in your head without any research, and then spend your lives cherrypicking "evidence" to prove it. Anything that contradicts you is literally discarded outright. And you'll believe anything that supports you, no matter how fucking flimsy or how much non-proof there is for it. In this case, some faggot Boomer shares a secondhand story about a fictional instructor claiming the flight paths were impossible.

It's funny how you shitheads will "question everything", yet I'm supposed to take it on nothing but FAITH that this little anecdote, that he provided zero proof ever happened, has no evidence that is true, and based on the way he told the story was clearly secondhand, is true? So I'm allowed to question the official narrative, but not the shit that some hentai-jerking obese blob working at Arby's spews onto the internet?

I thought you were "looking for answers" and "just asking questions", what part of his typed-at-a-4th-grade-level little fairy tale there was so compelling that you think any part of it was fucking true?

1. The very first plane to hit was AAL11 which was a straight-in approach, without any maneuvers. u/prayinpede fucking lied that it took them "23 attempts" to do. It would've taken literally one - you aim directly at it.

2. You mongoloids will always doubt thousands of experts but always believe anyone who claims to be one who supports your bullshit. Every fucking pilot in the world could disagree and you'll cling to your one anecdote, and then fluff up their credentials in a pathetic 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy. FlYiNg CoMbAt MiSsIoNs In ViEtNaM?!?!! OmG!!!!!!1!one

3. You will latch onto bullshit that makes your theories make LESS sense, not MORE. What the fuck is the implication that these flight paths were impossible? We literally have video of them hitting the towers. What, was this a fucking hologram projected onto some kind of different plane? Is that what the fucking implication here is?

4. You invent explanations in your head without any research, and then spend your lives cherrypicking "evidence" to prove it. Anything that contradicts you is literally discarded outright. And you'll believe anything that supports you, no matter how fucking flimsy or how much non-proof there is for it. In this case, some faggot Boomer shares a secondhand story about a fictional instructor claiming the flight paths were impossible.

It's funny how you shitheads will "question everything", yet I'm supposed to believe this little ratfuck's third-hand anecdote that he provided zero proof ever happened, has no evidence that is true, and based on the way he told the story, is clearly SECONDHAND. Some fucking crusty Boomer invented this story and you dipshits ate it up because it supports your bullshit.

I thought you were "looking for answers" and "just asking questions", what part of his typed-at-a-4th-grade-level little fairy tale there was so compelling that you think any part of it was fucking true?

1. The very first plane to hit was AAL11 which was a straight-in approach, without any maneuvers. u/prayinpede fucking lied that it took them "23 attempts" to do. It would've taken literally one - you aim directly at it.

2. You mongoloids will always doubt thousands of experts but always believe anyone who claims to be one who supports your bullshit. Every fucking pilot in the world could disagree and you'll cling to your one anecdote, and then fluff up their credentials in a pathetic 'Appeal to Authority' fallacy. FlYiNg CoMbAt MiSsIoNs In ViEtNaM?!?!! OmG!!!!!!1!one

3. You will latch onto bullshit that makes your theories make LESS sense, not MORE. What the fuck is the implication that these flight paths were impossible? We literally have video of them hitting the towers. What, was this a fucking hologram projected onto some kind of different plane? Is that what the fucking implication here is?

4. You invent explanations in your head without any research, and then spend your lives cherrypicking "evidence" to prove it. Anything that contradicts you is literally discarded outright. And you'll believe anything that supports you, no matter how fucking flimsy or how much non-proof there is for it. In this case, some faggot Boomer shares a secondhand story about a fictional instructor claiming the flight paths were impossible. Shithead here has no proof this conversation happened or what his relationship to this supposed 'simulation' was. But we're supposed to take his word for it? I'm supposed to believe this little ratfuck liar at face value, yet your vile kind will doubt literally everything else at face value?