Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES Front All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: Expanded comment

The fact you still think I said that proves you're the idiot, and maybe the bitch too since you're getting so ree-ass about it.

I said good faith is the idea behind it. Not that it meant anything to me. Not that I believed in it. Not that I wanted it. Not that anyone here wanted it. And not that the leftists wanted it.

Jesus, you're a fucking brick. Please learn to read before you respond. Please learn that I can extrapolate from a hypothetical point of reference without voicing my own belief, even if I believe the point of view is wrong.

Do you know what a hypothetical is? Please, please do not respond to me until you've researched that shit, bro.

You're like calling me a communist sympathizer because I could say that communism could work in a hypothetical scenario, but because it relies on those hypotheticals to function, it will never work in real life.

Please dude... Please... pull your head out of your ass. You're insulting me because I said a reelection could be a hypothetical show of good faith, and not that that was what I necessarily desired or that it would turn out that way in actuality.

I can't believe I have to sit here and baby someone into understanding what a "what-if scenario" is. I thought people here were supposed to be better than that...

You're working yourself up and turning ree-ass over a hypothetical; over nothing.

35 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The fact you still think I said that proves you're the idiot, and maybe the bitch too since you're getting so ree-ass about it.

I said good faith is the idea behind it. Not that it meant anything to me. Not that I believed in it. Not that I wanted it. Not that anyone here wanted it. And not that the leftists wanted it.

Jesus, you're a fucking brick. *Please learn to read *before you respond. Please learn that I can extrapolate from a hypothetical point of reference without voicing my own belief, even if I believe the point of view is wrong.

Do you know what a hypothetical is? Please, please do not respond to me until you've researched that shit, bro.

You're like calling me a communist sympathizer because I could say that communism could work in a hypothetical scenario, but because it relies on those hypotheticals to function, it will never work in real life.

Please dude... Please... pull your head out of your ass. You're insulting me because I said a reelection could be a hypothetical show of good faith, and not that that was what I necessarily desired or that it would turn out that way in actuality.

I can't believe I have to sit here and baby someone into understanding what a "what-if scenario" is. I thought people here were supposed to be better than that...

You're working yourself up and turning ree-ass over a hypothetical; over nothing.

35 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The fact you still think I said that proves you're the idiot, and maybe the bitch too since you're getting so ree-ass about it.

I said good faith is the idea behind it. Not that it meant anything to me. Not that I believed in it. Not that I wanted it. Not that anyone here wanted it. And not that the leftists wanted it.

Jesus, you're a fucking brick. *Please learn to read *before you respond. Please learn that I can extrapolate from a hypothetical point of reference without voicing my own belief, even if I believe the point of view is wrong.

Do you know what a hypothetical is? Please, please do not respond to me until you've researched that shit, bro.

You're like calling me a communist sympathizer because I could say that communism could work in a hypothetical scenario, but because it relies on those hypotheticals to function, it will never work in real life.

Please dude... Please... pull your head out of your ass. You're insulting me because I said a reelection could be a hypothetical show of good faith, and not that that was what I necessarily desired or that it would turn out that way in actuality.

I can't believe I have to sit here and baby someone into understanding what a "what-if scenario" is. I thought people here were supposed to be better than that...

35 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The fact you still think I said that proves you're the idiot, and maybe the bitch too since you're getting so ree-ass about it.

I said good faith is the idea behind it. Not that it meant anything to me. Not that I believed in it. Not that I wanted it. Not that anyone here wanted it. And not that the leftists wanted it.

Jesus, you're a fucking brick. Please learn to read before you respond. Please learn that I can extrapolate from a hypothetical point of reference without voicing my own belief, even if I believe the point of view is wrong.

Do you know what a hypothetical is? Please, please do not respond to me until you've researched that shit, bro.

You're like calling me a communist sympathizer because I could say that communism could work in a hypothetical scenario, but because it relies on those hypotheticals to function, it will never work in real life.

Please dude... Please... pull your head out of your ass. You're insulting me because I said a reelection could be a hypothetical show of good faith, and not that that was what I necessarily desired or that it would turn out that way in actuality.

I can't believe I have to sit here and baby someone into understanding what a "what-if scenario" is. I thought people here were supposed to be better than that...

35 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The fact you still think I said that proves you're the idiot, and maybe the bitch too since you're getting so ree-ass about it.

I said good faith is the idea behind it. Not that it meant anything to me. Not that I believed in it. Not that I wanted it. Not that anyone here wanted it. And not that the leftists wanted it.

Jesus, you're a fucking brick. Please learn to read before you respond. Please learn that I can extrapolate from a hypothetical point of without voicing my own belief, even if I believe the point of view is wrong.

Do you know what a hypothetical is? Please, please do not respond to me until you've researched that shit, bro.

You're like calling me a communist sympathizer because I could say that communism could work in a hypothetical scenario, but because it relies on those hypotheticals to function, it will never work in real life.

Please dude... Please... pull your head out of your ass. You're insulting me because I said a reelection could be a hypothetical show of good faith, and not that that was what I necessarily desired or that it would turn out that way in actuality.

I can't believe I have to sit here and baby someone into understanding what a "what-if scenario" is. I thought people here were supposed to be better than that...

35 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The fact you still think I said that proves you're the idiot, and maybe the bitch too since you're getting so ree-ass about it.

I said good faith is the idea behind it. Not that it meant anything to me. Not that I believed in it. Not that I wanted it. Not that anyone here wanted it. And not that the leftists wanted it.

Jesus, you're a fucking brick. Please learn to read before you respond. Please learn that I can extrapolate from a hypothetical point of without voicing my own belief, even if I believe the point of view is wrong.

Do you know what a hypothetical is? Please, please do not respond to me until you've researched that shit, bro.

You're like calling me a communist sympathizer because I could say that communism could work in a hypothetical scenario, but because it relies on those hypotheticals to function, it will never work in real life.

Please dude... Please... pull your head out of your ass. You're insulting me because I said a reelection could be a hypothetical show of good faith, and not that that was what I necessarily desired or that it would turn out that way in actuality.

I can't believe I have to sit here and baby someone into understanding what a "what-if scenario" is. I thought people here were supposed to be better than that.

35 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The fact you still think I said that proves you're the idiot, and maybe the bitch too since you're getting so ree-ass about it.

I said good faith is the idea behind it. Not that it meant anything to me. Not that I believed in it. Not that I wanted it. Not that anyone here wanted it. And not that the leftists wanted it.

Jesus, you're a fucking brick. Please learn to read before you respond. Please learn that I can extrapolate from a hypothetical point of without voicing my own belief, even if I believe the point of view is wrong.

Do you know what a hypothetical is? Please, please do not respond to me until you've researched that shit, bro.

You're like calling me a communist sympathizer because I could say that communism could work in a hypothetical scenario, but because it relies on those hypotheticals to function, it will never work in real life.

Please dude... Please... pull your head out of your ass. You're insulting me because I said a reelection could be a hypothetical show of good faith, and not that that was what I necessarily desired.

35 days ago
1 score