I made a post with some thoughts on this earlier. Basically, we wait. The reality of what is coming with this administration hasn't hit the average person yet. Plenty of people were fine with big tech censorship and they will continue to be so. Until it comes for them. Plenty of people will be fine with sweeping gun control. Until it affects them. For context, it took ~three years to go from the Townshend Acts to the Boston Massacre. Then another five years to go from the Boston Massacre to Lexington and Concord.

Right now, sentiment is against us. Any action we do, through literature, information, whatever, is seen as a "Trump" thing. They believe that the whole critique of the election was by Trump, for Trump. But I think if actual evidence that the GOP or "the right" rigged elections, we'd be equally disgusted. The best thing we can do in the mean time is show the best side of us to our neighbors and help them while BLM burns them down. It's known now that the Boston Massacre was more than likely instigated by the Sons of Liberty, something that was the focal point of John Adams' defense of the redcoats in court. But, at the time, that point of view would have been viewed as Loyalist or Tory propaganda. There's a fog of war that comes down while events are ongoing, fog that isn't lifted until two to three hundred years after the fact. When the participants of those events are long gone.

Before that though, the Sons of Liberty were able to ferment the Boston Massacre into anti-Crown sentiment. It's always better to be on the defense (or in this case, the perceived defense) before events happen, rather than be viewed as an aggressor. And an aggressor is what we would be viewed as (see the fallout from the Capitol incident as an example). The media is not on our side, therefore it needs to be overt. A lot of people weighed in negatively about Big Tech's censorship, even ones who have been critical about Trump, like Snowden (who has equally and justifiably shit on all Presidents since W.). This is a recent example of the terrain favoring the defender so to speak.

I made a post with some thoughts on this earlier. Basically, we wait. The reality of what is coming with this administration hasn't hit the average person yet. Plenty of people were fine with big tech censorship and they will continue to be so. Until it comes for them. Plenty of people will be fine with sweeping gun control. Until it affects them. For context, it took ~three years to go from the Townshend Acts to the Boston Massacre. Then another five years to go from the Boston Massacre to Lexington and Concord.

Right now, sentiment is against us. Any action we do, through literature, information, whatever, is seen as a "Trump" thing. They believe that the whole critique of the election was by Trump, for Trump. But I think if actual evidence that the GOP or "the right" rigged elections, we'd be equally disgusted. The best thing we can do in the mean time is show the best side of us to our neighbors and help them while BLM burns them down. It's known now that the Boston Massacre was more than likely instigated by the Sons of Liberty, something that was the focal point of John Adams' defense of the redcoats in court. But, at the time, that point of view would have been viewed as Loyalist or Tory propaganda. There's a fog of war that comes down while events are ongoing, fog that isn't lifted until two to three hundred years after the fact. When the participants of those events are long gone.

Before that though, the Sons of Liberty were able to ferment the Boston Massacre into anti-Crown sentiment. It's always better to be on defense before events happen, rather than be viewed as an aggressor. And an aggressor is what we would be viewed as (see the fallout from the Capitol incident as an example). The media is not on our side, therefore it needs to be overt. A lot of people weighed in negatively about Big Tech's censorship, even ones who have been critical about Trump, like Snowden (who has equally and justifiably shit on all Presidents since W.). This is a recent example of the terrain favoring the defender so to speak.