I don't even have to read more than a few lines of the article to have a strong suspicion of what's going on.

They're not just "mentioning" the WHO but potentially giving it power and authority.

Now I'm going to read the rest and see if this article is really telling the truth that the mention of the WHO is so innocuous.

Wow. Nowhere in the article does it explain the context. The entire article is useless.

I don't even have to read more than a few lines of the article to have a strong suspicious of that's going on.

They're not just "mentioning" the WHO but potentially giving it power and authority.

Now I'm going to read the rest and see if this article is really telling the truth that the mention of the WHO is so innocuous.

Wow. Nowhere in the article does it explain the context. The entire article is useless.

I don't even have to read more than a few lines of the article to have a strong suspicious of that's going on.

They're not just "mentioning" the WHO but potentially giving it power and authority.

Now I'm going to read the rest and see if this article is really telling the truth that the mention of the WHO is so innocuous.