There's something very funny going on. Press outlets say they have obtained a copy but all we're allowed to know is that there's a dispute because it refers to the WHO. It's a secret resolution and the press are maintaining that. Why so hush hush about it? It's definitely not necessary to invoke the WHO to call for a ceasefire.

Given the CNN has one of the least politically charged headlines it's really weird "US blocks UN resolution on global coronavirus ceasefire after China pushes WHO mention". Even the CNN is having a hard time putting a spin on "China had urged for the resolution to include reference to the efforts of the WHO, which prompted rejection from the US.".

Finally found what they might be talking about that they're trying to cover up...

The draft procedure highlighted the "urgent need to support all countries, as well as all relevant entities of the United Nations system, including specialized health agencies."

This originally read as:

The draft procedure highlighted the "urgent need to support all countries, as well as all relevant entities of the United Nations system, including the WHO."

Somehow they thought using a different way to refer it would make up for the fact they shouldn't be referring to it in the first place.

More details and less obfuscation from a non-mainstream outlet surprise surprise.

There's something very funny going on. Press outlets say they have obtained a copy but all we're allowed to know is that there's a dispute because it refers to the WHO. It's a secret resolution and the press are maintaining that. It's definitely not necessary to invoke the WHO to call for a ceasefire.

Given the CNN has one of the least politically charged headlines it's really weird "US blocks UN resolution on global coronavirus ceasefire after China pushes WHO mention". Even the CNN is having a hard time putting a spin on "China had urged for the resolution to include reference to the efforts of the WHO, which prompted rejection from the US.".

Finally found what they might be talking about that they're trying to cover up...

The draft procedure highlighted the "urgent need to support all countries, as well as all relevant entities of the United Nations system, including specialized health agencies."

This originally read as:

The draft procedure highlighted the "urgent need to support all countries, as well as all relevant entities of the United Nations system, including the WHO."

Somehow they thought using a different way to refer it would make up for the fact they shouldn't be referring to it in the first place.

More details and less obfuscation from a non-mainstream outlet surprise surprise.

There's something very funny going on. Press outlets say they have obtained a copy but all we're allowed to know is that there's a dispute because it refers to the WHO. It's a secret resolution and the press are maintaining that. It's definitely not necessary to invoke the WHO to call for a ceasefire.

Given the CNN has one of the least politically charged headlines it's really weird "US blocks UN resolution on global coronavirus ceasefire after China pushes WHO mention". Even the CNN is having a hard time putting a spin on "China had urged for the resolution to include reference to the efforts of the WHO, which prompted rejection from the US.".

Finally found what they might be talking about that they're trying to cover up...

The draft procedure highlighted the "urgent need to support all countries, as well as all relevant entities of the United Nations system, including specialized health agencies."

This originally read as:

The draft procedure highlighted the "urgent need to support all countries, as well as all relevant entities of the United Nations system, including the WHO."

Somehow they thought using a different way to refer it would make up for the fact they shouldn't be referring to it in the first place.