The now unequivocal propaganda is trying to deliberately keep people in the dark and shift the argument to make it sound like a petty dispute over something immaterial such as how to address the WHO rather than the issue of does the resolution need to address the WHO at all.

Further more, they're struggling to handle that it's the CCP attempting to prop up the WHO via the resolution making a ceasefire dependent on that and that it's the CCP sabotaging peace efforts which goes against their narrative of Trump is always wrong.

They're protecting their narrative and trying to rope people in. Some reporters might be hesitant when the CCP goes and does exactly the sort of thing you would expect them to if Trump is correct.

A site called DW which may have a primary focus against war gave the context for the text's reference to the WHO presumably in this case staying on point. They probably didn't get the memo to keep it mum being on the periphery.

It's catching the media in the act of propaganda like this that helps to red pill people.

The now unequivocal propaganda is trying to deliberately keep people in the dark and shift the argument to make it sound like a petty dispute over something immaterial such as how to address the WHO rather than the issue of does the resolution need to address the WHO at all.

Further more, they're struggling to handle that it's the CCP attempting to prop up the WHO via the resolution making a ceasefire dependent on that and that it's the CCP sabotaging peace efforts which goes against their narrative of Trump is always wrong.

They're protecting their narrative and trying to rope people in. Some reporters might be hesitant when the CCP goes and does exactly the sort of thing you would expect them to if Trump is correct.

A site called DW which may have a primary focus against war gave the context for the text's reference to the WHO presumably in this case staying on point. They probably didn't get the memo to keep it mum being on the periphery.

On the other hand they appear pretty independent which might be expected from smaller outlets:

A free press in China could have saved lives – DW Director General Peter Limbourg

It's catching the media in the act of propaganda like this that helps to red pill people.

The now unequivocal propaganda is trying to deliberately keep people in the dark and shift the argument to make it sound like a petty dispute over something immaterial such as how to address the WHO rather than the issue of does the resolution need to address the WHO at all.

Further more, they're struggling to handle that it's the CCP attempting to prop up the WHO via the resolution making a ceasefire dependent on that and that it's the CCP sabotaging peace efforts which goes against their narrative of Trump is always wrong.

They're protecting their narrative and trying to rope people in. Some reporters might be hesitant when the CCP goes and does exactly the sort of thing you would expect them to if Trump is correct.

A site called DW which may have a primary focus against war gave the context for the text's reference to the WHO presumably in this case staying on point. They probably didn't get the memo to keep it mum being on the periphery.

It's catching the media in the act of propaganda like this that helps to red pill people.

The now unequivocal propaganda is trying to deliberately keep people in the dark and shift the argument to make it sound like a petty dispute over something immaterial such as how to address the WHO rather than the issue of does the resolution need to address the WHO at all.

Further more, they're struggling to handle that it's the CCP attempting to prop up the WHO via the resolution making a ceasefire dependent on that and that it's the CCP sabotaging peace efforts which goes against their narrative of Trump is always wrong.

They're protecting their narrative and trying to rope people in. Some reporters might be hesitant when the CCP goes and does exactly the sort of thing you would expect them to if Trump is correct.

A site called DW which may have a primary focus against war gave the context for the text's reference to the WHO presumably in this case staying on point.

It's catching the media in the act of propaganda like this that helps to red pill people.

The now unequivocal propaganda is trying to deliberately keep people in the dark and shift the argument to make it sound like a petty dispute over something immaterial such as how to address the WHO rather than the issue of does the resolution need to address the WHO at all.

Further more, they're struggling to handle that it's the CCP attempting to prop up the WHO via the resolution making a ceasefire dependent on that and that it's the CCP sabotaging peace efforts which goes against their narrative of Trump is always wrong.

They're protecting their narrative and trying to rope people in. Some reporters might be hesitant when the CCP goes and does exactly the sort of thing you would expect them to if Trump is correct.

A site called DW which may have a primary focus against war gave the context for the text's reference to the WHO presumably in this case staying on point.

It's catching the media in the act like this of propaganda that helps to red pill people.

The now unequivocal propaganda is trying to deliberately keep people in the dark and shift the argument to make it sound like a petty dispute over something immaterial such as how to address the WHO rather than the issue of does the resolution need to address the WHO at all.

Further more, they're struggling to handle that it's the CCP attempting to prop up the WHO via the resolution making a ceasefire dependent on that and that it's the CCP sabotaging peace efforts which goes against their narrative of Trump is always wrong.

They're protecting their narrative and trying to rope people in.

A site called DW which may have a primary focus against war gave the context for the text's reference to the WHO presumably in this case staying on point.

The now unequivocal propaganda is trying to deliberately keep people in the dark and shift the argument to make it sound like a petty dispute over something immaterial such as how to address the WHO rather than the issue of does the resolution need to address the WHO at all.

Further more, they're struggling to handle that it's the CCP attempting to prop up the WHO via the resolution making a ceasefire dependent on that and that it's the CCP sabotaging peace efforts which goes against their narrative of Trump is always wrong.

A site called DW which may have a primary focus against war gave the context for the text's reference to the WHO presumably in this case staying on point.