When I try to explain my position on this thoroughly it takes hours, days of verbal explanation and tens of thousands of words. I support Trump but I'm a truth first kind of person so I pursue all the fors and againsts.

Actually I have disproven some of Shiva's claims of fraud.

So when I rule this was stolen well I'm not going to give you all that heavy stuff but I'm pretty damned sure.

I was still uncertain because ultimately only checking and finding out more can lead to finding out enough this way or that but it is when they refuse to let anyone find out you know it's that way and not this way.

If it was this way they would say some on board audit all you like until your heart's content. They wouldn't say now we're the lawmakers we're going to make it unlawful to ask if we were lawfully elected or not.

You don't go on the defensive when there's nothing to defend. They're being corrupt in plain sight and sometimes breaking the law in the name of stopping us checking for corruption?

The horror of the game is the prize for winning is being able to rewrite the rules of the game at will even retrospectively.

I think we're being too hard on Rand Paul though. He was in a damned if you do damned if you don't situation. Show a little respect. We won't bring him around to our side being just as unfair as the other side. It sucks but give him the opportunity for redemption. I don't do unfair.

When I try to explain my position on this thoroughly it takes hours, days of verbal explanation and tens of thousands of words. I support Trump but I'm a truth first kind of person so I pursue all the fors and againsts.

Actually I have disproven some of Shiva's claims of fraud.

So when I rule this was stolen well I'm not going to give you all that heavy stuff but I'm pretty damned sure.

I was still uncertain because ultimately only checking and finding out more can lead to finding out enough this way or that but it is when they refuse to let anyone find out you know it's that way and not this way.

If it was this way they would say some on board audit all you like until your heart's content. They wouldn't say now we're the lawmakers we're going to make it unlawful to ask if we were lawfully elected or not.

You don't go on the defensive when there's nothing to defend. They're being corrupt in plain sight and sometimes breaking the law in the name of stopping us checking for corruption?

The horror of the game is the prize for winning is being able to rewrite the rules of the game at will even retrospectively.

I think we're being too hard on Rand Paul though. He was in a damned if you do damned if you don't situation. Show a little respect. We won't bring him around to our side being just as unfair as the other side. It sucks but give him the opportunity for redemption.

When I try to explain my position on this thoroughly it takes hours, days of verbal explanation and tens of thousands of words. I support Trump but I'm a truth first kind of person so I pursue all the fors and againsts.

Actually I have disproven some of Shiva's claims of fraud.

So when I rule this was stolen well I'm not going to give you all that heavy stuff but I'm pretty damned sure.

I was still uncertain because ultimately only checking and finding out more can lead to finding out enough this way or that but it is when they refuse to let anyone find out you know it's that way and not this way.

If it was this way they would say some on board audit all you like until your heart's content. They wouldn't say now we're the lawmakers we're going to make it unlawful to ask if we were lawfully elected or not.

You don't go on the defensive when there's nothing to defend. They're being corrupt in plain sight and sometimes breaking the law in the name of stopping us checking for corruption?

The horror of the game is the prize for winning is being able to rewrite the rules of the game at will even retrospectively.