Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No! Roberts isnt presiding over it because it is clearly so unconstitutional and would set dangerous precedent for SCOTUS. Being the scumbag POS he is, instead of saying its unconstitutional and that he doesn't want a hand in it, he just steps aside like a pussy

79 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No! Roberts is presiding over it because it is clearly so unconstitutional and would set dangerous precedent for SCOTUS. Being the scumbag POS he is, instead of saying its unconstitutional and that he doesn't want a hand in it, he just steps aside like a pussy

79 days ago
1 score