Reason: None provided.
No! Roberts isnt presiding over it because it is clearly so unconstitutional and would set dangerous precedent for SCOTUS. Being the scumbag POS he is, instead of saying its unconstitutional and that he doesn't want a hand in it, he just steps aside like a pussy
26 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original
No! Roberts is presiding over it because it is clearly so unconstitutional and would set dangerous precedent for SCOTUS. Being the scumbag POS he is, instead of saying its unconstitutional and that he doesn't want a hand in it, he just steps aside like a pussy
26 days ago
1 score