No. That’s not how that works. If I decide to come forward with a ridiculous preposterous theory, you are not obligated to come up with an alternative in order for me to be wrong.

If I tell you that there are frogs falling out of the sky, that’s either true or false. I don’t have to come up with the theory that explains why there are no frogs falling out of the sky. There just aren’t any frogs falling out of the sky. What theory do you need? What alternative? There are no frogs.

And despite all of this, alternative theories to some of your ridiculous propositions have been offered to you you just don’t like them. You dismiss everything that doesn’t fit your narrative. I seen you do it. You do it every day. Somebody comes up with a perfectly reasonable explanation for why something happened and you just wave your hand and dismiss it and then claim no one has ever disputed it. You are worse than liberals. Because you should know better.

Your sub is filled with people who, less than one month ago, became furiously angry if you suggested that Biden would be inaugurated (even if fake). You flew off the handle and told us we were communists or bots. Well guess what?

INAUGURATED

You became apoplectic at the mere suggestion that no one would be publicly arrested by this point, but guess what!

WRONG AGAIN.

Wrong, literally, over and over and over and over and over again for almost 4 full fucking years now and you never admit it. You not only demand people believe you even though you’ve been wrong repeatedly, you actually get arrogant and defensive and smug and belligerent about it.

Who the hell do you think you are?

If I’m wrong about something for almost 4 years can you imagine the arrogance in expecting anyone to continue to listen to me, nonetheless demand that they believe me? Who the hell do you think you are?

This points directly to the lack of logic among you people. Your brains never fully developed that’s why you do this. This only happens in people with stunted mental growth. Your inability to distinguish patterns from coincidence is childish, literally, your brain is under developed. It is the brain of a child.

No. That’s not how that works. If I decide to come forward with a ridiculous preposterous theory, you are not obligated to come up with an alternative in order for me to be wrong.

If I tell you that there are frogs falling out of the sky, that’s either true or false. I don’t have to come up with the theory that explains why there are no frogs falling out of the sky. There just aren’t any frogs falling out of the sky. What theory do you need? What alternative? There are no frogs.

And despite all of this, alternative theories to some of your ridiculous propositions have been offered to you you just don’t like them. You dismiss everything that doesn’t fit your narrative. I seen you do it. You do it every day. Somebody comes up with a perfectly reasonable explanation for why something happened and you just wave your hand and dismiss it and then claim no one has ever disputed it. You are worse than liberals. Because you should know better.

This points directly to the lack of logic among you people. Your brains never fully developed that’s why you do this. This only happens in people with stunted mental growth. Your inability to distinguish patterns from coincidence is childish, literally, your brain is under developed. It is the brain of a child.