I think they already built that to a degree with television and the printing press.

Now the ice is melting though. The printing press caused a lot of upset. The established media is like the horse and cart industry trying to undo the self propelled cart industry. They're fighting against a neo-reformation or a new enlightenment.

They're jealous of social media because they have a tiny chunk of that but they still do have a lot of real influence and not just the influence of the numbers across various realms.

What they're doing now is either a death's cry or and attempt to kill freedom of information before it kills them. It's an irony because the path they need to take to survive as a useful service is the opposite of the one they're taking. In terms of the flow of information they're an empire in collapse due to the discovery of vast and almost unlimited new territories.

They're previously taken advantage of for example being the only ones with the frequency allocation. Their service has become to fill the airwaves.

They haven't really lived in a truly competitive environment. You would think they would grow and be healthy when distribution becomes near free.

The issue isn't competition but anti-competition. In a way they're the same but one is healthy one is not.

Anti-competition can thrive in gray zones. Anti-competition is cheating or undermines the purpose of the competition. It's obvious when it consists of for example poisoning a competitor before the boxing match.

In the realm of business and complex systems there are less obvious abuses. Whenever the media is reporting on it's competition however, people with audiences that's always a huge red flag for anti-competition.

You'll notice these limits are usually applied in advertising though people forget what it's about. Adverts will tend to avoid directly attacking their competitors and be very careful with comparisons.

There are various unwritten or forgotten rules regarding fighting dirty.

I think they already built that to a degree with television and the printing press.

Now the ice is melting though. The printing press caused a lot of upset. The established media is like the horse and cart industry trying to undo the self propelled cart industry. They're fighting against a neo-reformation or a new enlightenment.

They're jealous of social media because they have a tiny chunk of that but they still do have a lot of real influence and not just the influence of the numbers across various realms.

What they're doing now is either a death's cry or and attempt to kill freedom of information before it kills them. It's an irony because the path they need to take to survive as a useful service is the opposite of the one they're taking.

They're previously taken advantage of for example being the only ones with the frequency allocation. Their service has become to fill the airwaves.

They haven't really lived in a truly competitive environment. You would think they would grow and be healthy when distribution becomes near free.

The issue isn't competition but anti-competition. In a way they're the same but one is healthy one is not.

Anti-competition can thrive in gray zones. Anti-competition is cheating or undermines the purpose of the competition. It's obvious when it consists of for example poisoning a competitor before the boxing match.

In the realm of business and complex systems there are less obvious abuses. Whenever the media is reporting on it's competition however, people with audiences that's always a huge red flag for anti-competition.

You'll notice these limits are usually applied in advertising though people forget what it's about. Adverts will tend to avoid directly attacking their competitors and be very careful with comparisons.

There are various unwritten or forgotten rules regarding fighting dirty.

I think they already built that to a degree with television and the printing press.

Now the ice is melting though. The printing press caused a lot of upset. The established media is like the horse and cart industry trying to undo the self propelled cart industry. They're fighting against a neo-reformation.

They're jealous of social media because they have a tiny chunk of that but they still do have a lot of real influence and not just the influence of the numbers across various realms.

What they're doing now is either a death's cry or and attempt to kill freedom of information before it kills them. It's an irony because the path they need to take to survive as a useful service is the opposite of the one they're taking.

They're previously taken advantage of for example being the only ones with the frequency allocation. Their service has become to fill the airwaves.

They haven't really lived in a truly competitive environment. You would think they would grow and be healthy when distribution becomes near free.

The issue isn't competition but anti-competition. In a way they're the same but one is healthy one is not.

Anti-competition can thrive in gray zones. Anti-competition is cheating or undermines the purpose of the competition. It's obvious when it consists of for example poisoning a competitor before the boxing match.

In the realm of business and complex systems there are less obvious abuses. Whenever the media is reporting on it's competition however, people with audiences that's always a huge red flag for anti-competition.

You'll notice these limits are usually applied in advertising though people forget what it's about. Adverts will tend to avoid directly attacking their competitors and be very careful with comparisons.

There are various unwritten or forgotten rules regarding fighting dirty.

I think they already built that to a degree with television and the printing press.

Now the ice is melting though. The printing press caused a lot of upset. The established media is like the horse and cart industry trying to undo the self propelled cart industry.

They're jealous of social media because they have a tiny chunk of that but they still do have a lot of real influence and not just the influence of the numbers across various realms.

What they're doing now is either a death's cry or and attempt to kill freedom of information before it kills them. It's an irony because the path they need to take to survive as a useful service is the opposite of the one they're taking.

They're previously taken advantage of for example being the only ones with the frequency allocation. Their service has become to fill the airwaves.

They haven't really lived in a truly competitive environment. You would think they would grow and be healthy when distribution becomes near free.

The issue isn't competition but anti-competition. In a way they're the same but one is healthy one is not.

Anti-competition can thrive in gray zones. Anti-competition is cheating or undermines the purpose of the competition. It's obvious when it consists of for example poisoning a competitor before the boxing match.

In the realm of business and complex systems there are less obvious abuses. Whenever the media is reporting on it's competition however, people with audiences that's always a huge red flag for anti-competition.

You'll notice these limits are usually applied in advertising though people forget what it's about. Adverts will tend to avoid directly attacking their competitors and be very careful with comparisons.

There are various unwritten or forgotten rules regarding fighting dirty.

I think they already built that to a degree with television and the printing press.

Now the ice is melting though.

They're jealous of social media because they have a tiny chunk of that but they still do have a lot of real influence and not just the influence of the numbers across various realms.

What they're doing now is either a death's cry or and attempt to kill freedom of information before it kills them. It's an irony because the path they need to take to survive as a useful service is the opposite of the one they're taking.

They're previously taken advantage of for example being the only ones with the frequency allocation. Their service has become to fill the airwaves.

They haven't really lived in a truly competitive environment. You would think they would grow and be healthy when distribution becomes near free.

The issue isn't competition but anti-competition. In a way they're the same but one is healthy one is not.

Anti-competition can thrive in gray zones. Anti-competition is cheating or undermines the purpose of the competition. It's obvious when it consists of for example poisoning a competitor before the boxing match.

In the realm of business and complex systems there are less obvious abuses. Whenever the media is reporting on it's competition however, people with audiences that's always a huge red flag for anti-competition.

You'll notice these limits are usually applied in advertising though people forget what it's about. Adverts will tend to avoid directly attacking their competitors and be very careful with comparisons.

There are various unwritten or forgotten rules regarding fighting dirty.