Exactly. It’s a difficult balance that can have the opposite effect, like any law really. But I think we’re almost all in agreement here in that we want a competitive free and fair market. Perhaps what needs to happen is what the above user said. Regulations and antitrust are given a trial period. Data quantified. See what sticks.

I’d like to see people run with an idea of something as simple as having the company pay extra tax, commensurate to percentage of market share owned, for changing prices of their products. To avoid the loophole of simply running multiple companies, perhaps major shareholders could be taken into account when calculating market share. Just a shower thought. Either way, undercutting small businesses is never a healthy practice, imo,

Exactly. It’s a difficult balance that can have the opposite effect, like any law really. But I think we’re almost all in agreement here in that we want a competitive free and fair market. Perhaps what needs to happen is what the above user said. Regulations and antitrust are given a trial period. Data quantified. See what sticks.

I’d like to see people run with an idea of something as simple as having the company pay extra tax, commensurate to percentage of market share owned, for changing prices of their products. Undercutting small businesses is never a healthy practice, imo,