Right.But that is just texting. Unless those people also didn't normally vote then their vote was not suppressed.

And even if they did not vote normally if it can be shown that they could not or would not have voted then their vote was not suppressed.

The government does not actually identify any PERSONS who were suppressed but makes the assumption of suppression from phone numbers. Nowhere in the full indictment do they have a person who says "I did not vote because of this." Having people who can say that is an important criteria in suppression cases.

Right.But that is just texting. Unless those people also didn't normally vote then their vote was not suppressed.

And even if they did not vote normally if it can be shown that they could not or would not have voted then their vote was not suppressed.

The government does not actually identify any PERSONS where were suppressed but makes the assumption of suppression from phone numbers. Nowhere in the full indictment do they have a person who says "I did not vote because of this." Having people who can say that is an important criteria in suppression cases.