The AG may flip and be Pence 2, but Pence never really did anything to speak out or stop the steal before he betrayed 75,000,000 Conservatives. What's the board of supervisors really trying to do? What is Jack Sellers' angle?

1. If he's anti-Trump, Trump lost, Biden was inaugurated. He can't reverse it. So why fight the audit?
2. If the results were faked via the hardware/software, he can just say, 'I had no idea. Just like everybody else in other states who used the hardware and software, we had no idea.' He won't get in trouble with Republicans or Democrats. He only gets in trouble or recalled if he fights the audit. I don't get it. Do you? Also, what are the names of the lawyers advising Sellers and supervisors?

I find it stunning that some members of the Senate were almost tricked by the audit plan of the supervisors. Who is advising the supervisors separate from their legal counsel? Are they coming up with all their ideas on their own? That's some pretty shady sh*-t they're trying to pull.

The AG may flip and be Pence 2, but Pence never really did anything to speak out or stop the steal before he betrayed 75,000,000 Conservatives. What's the board of supervisors really trying to do? What is Jack Sellers' angle?

1. If he's anti-Trump, Trump lost, Biden was inaugurated. He can't reverse it. So why fight the audit?
2. If the results were faked via the hardware/software, he can just say, 'I had no idea. Just like everybody else in other states who used the hardware and software, we had no idea.' He won't get in trouble with Republicans or Democrats. He only gets in trouble or recalled if he fights the audit. I don't get it. Do you?

Also, what are the names of the lawyers advising Sellers and supervisors?

The AG may flip and be Pence 2, but Pence never really did anything to speak out or stop the steal before he betrayed 75,000,000 Conservatives.

What's the board of supervisors really trying to do? What is Jack Sellers' angle?

1. If he's anti-Trump, Trump lost, Biden was inaugurated. He can't reverse it. So why fight the audit?

2. If the results were faked via the hardware/software, he can just say, 'I had no idea. Just like everybody else in other states who used the hardware and software, we had no idea.' He won't get in trouble with Republicans or Democrats. He only gets in trouble or recalled if he fights the audit.

I don't get it. Do you?