I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for others.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, which is too kind. They are really just opportunists and criminals with a thirst for power, whatever the cost to everyone else.

I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for others.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, which is too kind. They are really just opportunists and criminals with a lust for power, whatever the cost to everyone else.

I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for others.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, and they do not even do that. They are really just opportunists and criminals with a lust for power, whatever the cost to everyone else.

I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, and they do not even do that. They are really just opportunists and criminals with a lust for power, whatever the cost to everyone else.

I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, and they do not even do that. They are really just opportunists and criminals with a lust for power, whatever the cost.

I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

"Communists" does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, and they do not even do that. They are truly just opportunists and criminals with a lust for power.

I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

The "communist" moniker does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, and they do not even do that. They are truly just opportunists and criminals who enjoy power.

I mean, "WhiteSpy" is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. That's the situation we're now entering.

The "communist" moniker does not work because it does not insult them. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, and they do not even do that. They are truly just opportunists and criminals.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. And that's the situation we're now entering.

The "communist" moniker does not work because it does not insult them. It's too kind. It implies they at least subscribe to some kind of ideal, and they do not even do that. They are just power-hungry criminals.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. And that's the situation we're now entering.

The "communist" moniker does not work because it does not insult them. It's too kind. It implies they pretend to uphold some kind of ideal, which they do not. They are really actually just criminals.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting top-down dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. And that's the situation we're now entering.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting rulers. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else. And that's the situation we're now entering.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting rulers. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else, and that's the situation we're now entering.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, where you toe the party line or else, and that's the situation we're now entering.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They love having property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, and that's the situation we're now entering.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" only insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

China is a totalitarian mafia state, and that's the situation we're now entering.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" only insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

However, it is a totalitarian mafia state, which is the same situation we're now entering.

I mean, the "WhiteSpy" dude is right. They are authoritarian, fascist, freedom-restricting dictators. They are an abusive oligarchic elite that has one set of rules for them and another set for everyone else.

They are "communist" only insofar as communism, in practice, involves all those elements. They are not "communist" in the sense of no private property. They are as "communist" as present-day China, which has plenty of billionaires.

However, it is a totalitarian mafia state, which is the same situation we're now entering.