I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That's the excuse they're using right now to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't they use that excuse on 2nd amendment rights?

I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That's the excuse they're using right now to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't they use that excuse on 2nd amendment rights?

I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That the excuse they're using right now to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't they use that excuse on 2nd amendment rights?

I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That's the excuse they're currently using to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't they extend that to apply to 2nd amendment rights?

I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That's the excuse they're currently using to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't extend that to apply to 2nd amendment rights?

I'm pretty sure the language "seize guns" is not meant to apply to someone in the act of committing a crime. It's clearly meant to apply to "red flag" laws. Which will eventually apply to people who "question the election results" because that leads to "real world violence". That's the excuse they're currently using to stifle 1st amendment rights, why wouldn't extend that to apply to 2nd amendment rights?