Source: https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/US-Election-Fraud-2020_General.xlsx
The documentary is very useful, especially the section on hacking, but the animated map of attacks is a bit misleading. The Deep Capture files, which appear to be the ones in the documentary, do show many cyber attacks on U.S. election systems, but those records only show votes changed in a small number of hacks, shown in the table above.
The U.S. government needs to stop using stupid generalities like "foreign interference" and start publishing very specific hacking data; otherwise their statements will have almost no impact.
Edit: Post title says graph. Meant table, of course.
Update
I was trying to track down the provenance of the data. It was brought to my attention in the recently released Absolute Proof documentary. Using the name of one hacker's network location identified in the background of the video, it was tracked to Patrick Bryne's site, Deep Capture.
In a news article it was reported Bryne said that he had been approached by a federal agent in 2018 and told to be quiet through the 2020 election. He concluded the 2020 election was going to be rigged.
Bryne also said that in the months preceding the 2020 election he was part of a team, or closely connected to a team, that was monitoring attempts to rig the election. I don't believe he went into detail about who was in this team or where it was based.
Mary Fanning, in the documentary in the section on hacking to steal the election, talks about the dataset of hacking records that appears in the documentary. She did not introduce the data or identify how she got it. It is the exact same data in the Excel file on DeepCapture.
It is not clear if Fanning got the data from Bryne, or if Bryne got the data from Fanning. Or if Fanning got her data from another source, and simply talked about the data that Bryne had posted on his site and was used in the documentary.
In an interview video in recent weeks, Fanning was asked where she got the data. She did not answer. She was asked again. Once again she did not answer. I think she was even asked a third time but would not say. She is a national security researcher and writer and her previous research has included a system used by the Deep State for spying. She has good reason to be very careful and very discrete with information and sources.
The most basic issue about credibility in one sense is whether or not the election machines were even online. All indications so far, including a forensic audit in Antrim, Michigan, are that the machines were indeed capable of being connected to the internet.
There are also indications that the data on these machines could not only have been accessed remotely from anywhere in the world, but also hacked in a way whereby the vote data could be modified.
Source: https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/US-Election-Fraud-2020_General.xlsx
The documentary is very useful, especially the section on hacking, but the animated map of attacks is a bit misleading. The Deep Capture files, which appear to be the ones in the documentary, do show many cyber attacks on U.S. election systems, but those records only show votes changed in a small number of hacks, shown in the graph above.
The U.S. government needs to stop using stupid generalities like "foreign interference" and start publishing very specific hacking data; otherwise their statements will have almost no impact.
Edit: Post title says graph. Meant table, of course.
Update
I was trying to track down the provenance of the data. It was brought to my attention in the recently released Absolute Proof documentary. Using the name of one hacker's network location identified in the background of the video, it was tracked to Patrick Bryne's site, Deep Capture.
In a news article it was reported Bryne said that he had been approached by a federal agent in 2018 and told to be quiet through the 2020 election. He concluded the 2020 election was going to be rigged.
Bryne also said that in the months preceding the 2020 election he was part of a team, or closely connected to a team, that was monitoring attempts to rig the election. I don't believe he went into detail about who was in this team or where it was based.
Mary Fanning, in the documentary in the section on hacking to steal the election, talks about the dataset of hacking records that appears in the documentary. She did not introduce the data or identify how she got it. It is the exact same data in the Excel file on DeepCapture.
It is not clear if Fanning got the data from Bryne, or if Bryne got the data from Fanning. Or if Fanning got her data from another source, and simply talked about the data that Bryne had posted on his site and was used in the documentary.
In an interview video in recent weeks, Fanning was asked where she got the data. She did not answer. She was asked again. Once again she did not answer. I think she was even asked a third time but would not say. She is a national security researcher and writer and her previous research has included a system used by the Deep State for spying. She has good reason to be very careful and very discrete with information and sources.
The most basic issue about credibility in one sense is whether or not the election machines were even online. All indications so far, including a forensic audit in Antrim, Michigan, are that the machines were indeed capable of being connected to the internet.
There are also indications that the data on these machines could not only have been accessed remotely from anywhere in the world, but also hacked in a way whereby the vote data could be modified.
Source: https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/US-Election-Fraud-2020_General.xlsx
The documentary is very useful, especially the section on hacking, but the animated map of attacks is a bit misleading. The Deep Capture files, which appear to be the ones in the documentary, do show many cyber attacks on U.S. election systems, but those records only show votes changed in a small number of hacks, shown in the graph above.
The U.S. government needs to stop using stupid generalities like "foreign interference" and start publishing very specific hacking data; otherwise their statements will have almost no impact.
Edit: Post title says graph. Meant table, of course.
Source: https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/US-Election-Fraud-2020_General.xlsx
The documentary is very useful, especially the section on hacking, but the animated map of attacks is a bit misleading. The Deep Capture files, which appear to be the ones in the documentary, do show many cyber attacks on U.S. election systems, but those records only show votes changed in a small number of hacks, shown in the graph above.
The U.S. government needs to stop using stupid generalities like "foreign interference" and start publishing very specific hacking data; otherwise their statements will have almost no impact.
Source: https://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/US-Election-Fraud-2020_General.xlsx
The documentary is very useful, especially the section on hacking, but the animated map of attacks is a bit misleading. The Deep Capture files, which appear to be the ones in the documentary, do show many cyber attacks on U.S. election systems, but those records only show votes changed in a small number of hacks, shown in the graph above.