Your question is rhetorical, of course, and the obvious answer is that they DON'T accuse Trump of real misdeeds because they CAN'T.

They spent $40 million dollars to investigate Trump -- more money that the 9/11 and Challenger investigations combined.

When they did that investigation, they said it was about collusion with Russia, but the truth is, they would have been happy to find anything. If they had found any crime that they could hang around Trump's neck, they would have done so.

But they found nothing!

Compared to any politician in Washington (especially the ones making the accusations), Trump is squeaky clean.

Your question is rhetorical, of course, and the obvious answer is that they DON'T accuse Trump of real misdeeds because they CAN'T. They spent $40 million dollars to investigate Trump -- more money that the 9/11 and Challenger investigations combined. When they did that investigation, they said it was about collusion with Russia, but the truth is, they would have been happy to find anything. If they had found any crime that they could hang around Trump's neck, they would have done so. But they found nothing! Compared to any politician in Washington (especially the ones making the accusations), Trump is squeaky clean.

Your question is rhetorical, of course, and the obvious answer is that they DON'T accuse Trump of real misdeeds because they CAN'T.

They spent $40 million dollars to investigate Trump -- more money that the 9/11 and Challenger investigations combined.

When they did that investigation, they said it was about collusion with Russia, but the truth is, they would have happy to find anything. If they had found any crime that they could hang around Trump's neck, they would have done so.

But they found nothing!

Compared to any politician in Washington (especially the ones making the accusations), Trump is squeaky clean.