Reason: None provided.
Their argument is "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is in the Constitution, and they will starve to death without free food or free house, therefore not getting one is a violation of their right to life.
It's stupid on so many levels, not the least of which is that is not actually in the Constitution.
61 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original
Their argument is "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is in the Constitution, and they will starve to death without free food or free house, therefore not getting one is a violation of their right to life.
It's stupid on so many levels not the least of which is that that's not in the Constitution.
61 days ago
1 score