But it's a perfect example of dishonesty.

Except that it is not. The lady never made the suggestion that the doctored evidence was unimportant.

That suggestion was entirely fabricated by Van Der Veer, full stop.

Watch the video over and over again if you have to. The lady simply did not make this assertion, at any time. In fact, she attempted to clear the air about it, but couldn't get a word in edgewise, because Van Der Veer was going off.

For the record, I think Van Der Veer is a patriot and absolute beast. He absolutely slayed it in Congress and is a hero.

However, pairing him up with the lady journalist was a colossal mismatch. He is a ferocious lion and she is barely a kitten. A better pairing would have been McEnany and news lady.

Note I have no idea what news lady's name is nor do I care. She is just another MSM droid to me. Having said, our side looks dumb when we rally around quixotic battles like this one and feed into our own paranoia.

Yes, MSM is hopelessly biased at best, and mockingbird propaganda at worst. But in this particular exchange, our side jumped down the throat of the other side prematurely and unnecessarily and it made us look unhinged.

Winning is a nuanced art and this particular exchange was not a victory for our side.

The overall impeachment hoax was a resounding victory, however, and we have Van Der Veer to thank for it, in part.

But it's a perfect example of dishonesty.

Except that it is not. The lady never made the suggestion that the doctored evidence was unimportant.

That suggestion was entirely fabricated by Van Der Veer, full stop.

Watch the video over and over again if you have to. The lady simply did not make this assertion, at any time. In fact, she attempted to clear the air about it, but couldn't get a word in edgewise, because Van Der Veer was going off.

For the record, I think Van Der Veer is a patriot and absolute beast. He absolutely slayed it in Congress and is a hero.

However, pairing him up with the lady journalist was a colossal mismatch. He is a ferocious lion and she is barely a kitten. A better pairing would have been McEnany and news lady.

Note I have no idea what news lady's name is nor do I care. She is just another MSM droid to me. Having said, our side looks dumb when we rally around quixotic battles like this one and feed into our own paranoia. Yes, MSM is hopelessly biased at best, and mockingbird propaganda at worst. But in this particular exchange, our side jumped down the throat of the other side prematurely and unnecessarily and it made us look unhinged.

Winning is a nuanced art and this particular exchange was not a victory for our side.

The overall impeachment hoax was a resounding victory, however, and we have Van Der Veer to thank for it, in part.

But it's a perfect example of dishonesty.

Except that it is not. The lady never made the suggestion that the doctored evidence was unimportant.

That suggestion was entirely fabricated by Van Der Veer, full stop.

Watch the video over and over again if you have to. The lady simply did not make this assertion, at any time. In fact, she attempted to clear the air about it, but couldn't get a word in edgewise, because Van Der Veer was going off.

For the record, I thing Van Der Veer is a patriot and absolute beast. He absolutely slayed it in Congress and is a hero.

However, pairing him up with the lady journalist was a colossal mismatch. He is a ferocious lion and she is barely a kitten. A better pairing would have been McEnany and news lady.

Note I have no idea what news lady's name is nor do I care. She is just another MSM droid to me. Having said, our side looks dumb when we rally around quixotic battles like this one and feed into our own paranoia.

Yes, MSM is hopelessly biased at best, and mockingbird propaganda at worst. But in this particular exchange, our side jumped down the throat of the other side prematurely and unnecessarily and it made us look unhinged.

Winning is a nuanced art and this particular exchange was not a victory for our side.

The overall impeachment hoax was a resounding victory, however, and we have Van Der Veer to thank for it, in part.