It's what men want and it's what women do when they find the right man and aren't reliant on the State. Women that don't submit to their husband aren't desirable by men and men who aren't valuable enough to women that women want to submit to them aren't desirable by women. It's the natural relationship structure. The issue is that this word itself has been entirely vilified by feminists to mean something entirely different than the actual truth. It doesn't mean slave. It never has and never ever did mean slave.

It just means ultimately the man is the leader of the overall family and relationship and the woman doesn't try to combat the man in all regards because she respect him enough to truly trust he has her and the family's interest at heart. Women who don't submit to their husbands are often seen as unruly, combative and "wears the pants" such that the man isn't as respected or taken seriously by others. Like how people view for example Prince Harry and his wife. She doesn't submit to her husband and that dynamic is exactly why she is so much hated by everyone regarding her relationship with Harry and why so many people think it won't last and why Trump said "he wishes him the best because he's going to need it". Relationships in which the woman doesn't submit to the man are not ideal. They can work but it's not ideal.

Hate the word all you want but understand the word first. Christians submit to God but they don't resent God or hate God or think that relationship is bad. Women who submit to their husbands and husbands who love and cherish their wives are the ideal relationship structure. The submission must be willingly and not forced though. In most relationships women do naturally submit without even realizing that's what they are doing but they'd never call it that because of how icky the word is but that's is in fact what they've done.

It's what men want and it's what women do when they find the right man and aren't reliant on the State. Women that don't submit to their husband aren't desirable by men and men who aren't valuable enough to women that women want to submit to them aren't desirable by women. It's the natural relationship structure. The issue is that this word itself has been entirely vilified by feminists to mean something entirely different than the actual truth. It doesn't mean slave. It never has and never ever did mean slave.

It just means ultimately the man is the leader of the overall family and relationship and the woman doesn't try to combat the man in all regards because she respect him enough to truly trust he has her and the family's interest at heart. Women who don't submit to their husbands are often seen as unruly, combative and "wears the pants" such that the man isn't as respected or taken seriously by others. Like how people view for example Prince Harry and his wife. She doesn't submit to her husband and that dynamic is exactly why she is so much hated by everyone regarding her relationship with Harry and why so many people think it won't last and why Trump said "he wishes him the best because he's going to need it". Relationships in which the woman doesn't submit to the man are not ideal. They can work but it's not ideal.

Hate the word all you want but understand the word first. Christian submit to God but they don't resent God or hate God or think that relationship is bad. Women who submit to their husbands and husbands who love and cherish their wives are the ideal relationship structure.