It was stupid, and self-defeating. Are patriots better off for it having happened, or worse?

I'm not taking any mainstream narratives about it at face value; I watched raw footage and noted the rioters weren't using guns, the zip tie narrative was a lie, I saw them walking in line through the ropes, etc. Sicknick wasn't killed by the rioters. On the other hand, I saw many of them hitting cops with flags, and acting like idiots.

As for the rest, you can disagree with retarded interventionist foreign policy without agreeing with Qtards larping 1776, instead of engaging in the sort of sustained activism that would have worked (and was in action throughout the decade before 1776).

It was stupid, and self-defeating. Are patriots better off for it having happened, or worse?

I'm not taking any mainstream narratives about it at face value; I watched raw footage and noted the rioters weren't using guns, the zip tie narrative was a lie, I saw them walking in line through the ropes, etc. Sicknick wasn't killed by the rioters. On the other hand, I saw many of them hitting cops with flags, and acting like idiots.

As for the rest, you can disagree with retarded interventionist foreign policy without agreeing with Qtards larping 1776, instead of engaging in the sort of sustained activism that would have worked.

It was stupid, and self-defeating. Are patriots better off for it having happened, or worse?

I'm not taking any mainstream narratives about it at face value; I watched raw footage and noted the rioters weren't using guns, the zip tie narrative was a lie, I saw them walking in line through the ropes, etc. On the other hand, I saw them hitting cops with flags, and acting like idiots.

As for the rest, you can disagree with retarded interventionist foreign policy without agreeing with Qtards larping 1776, instead of engaging in the sort of sustained activism that would have worked.