You sound like a programmer. Yes, there is a mutation problem. It's funny, though, you mention you're a software engineer. . . So, let's look at this for a second. Let's have it your way. . . let evolution be true. Now, shouldn't we be able to create software that "reproduces" and combines, and builds, and organizes on orders faster than normal biological reproduction, following the same structural growth of biological evolution, but for software? Where is it? Haven't figured it out yet? Or is there some "magic" you suppose that's in raw matter? Bud, there's nothing there. We're dust, and this all only makes sense with God at the beginning and helm of it all. You're building a house of cards and hiding behind technical babble. Evolution does not happen. You cannot show one single proof that evolution happens in the sense you believe.

And sorry, it is perfectly legitimate to ask what an animals is "turning into." Yes, I know we have conventions to categorize everything, blah blah blah, but everything (that is, EVERYTHING) is fully function, doing just what it was designed to do in its environment.

So, you know, think about it, there's a thing called luck. In all of the billions and trillions of living things that have existed, why has there never been something that survived despite having poor form with it's environment? Or that just eeked out an existence, but would be clearly seen as not very well adapted? Oh, because you have this theory about "survival of the fittest?" Okay, how do I measure that? Just look at humans today. Plenty of us survive, despite not being the best of the best of the best. So, where are all these creatures that are just not quite so perfect in their environment? They just all died, I guess. None of their fossils were preserved, though. Only the best of the best is what we see. If evolution were true (which is most definitely not) the world would look like a huge disgusting mess (and that's allowing an actual mechanism for it to even work). And this should especially speak to you, considering how you talk of all things being singular, and in some stage of transition. It'd be a huge mess. You haven't really tried your theory out. But the world is beautiful, and we all see it, and know that God is behind it all.

I will leave you with a video. I feel like if we have no baseline then there's not much point, so if you watch it, I'll respond. Otherwise, I'll leave it at this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU7Lww-sBPg

Please, pretty please, tell me why this guy is wrong.

You sound like a programmer. Yes, there is a mutation problem. It's funny, though, you mention you're a software engineer. . . So, let's look at this for a second. Let's have it your way. . . let evolution be true. Now, shouldn't we be able to create software that "reproduces" and combines, and builds, and organizes on orders faster than normal biological reproduction, following the same structural growth of biological evolution, but for software? Where is it? Haven't figured it out yet? Or is there some "magic" you suppose that's in raw matter? Bud, there's nothing there. We're dust, and this all only makes sense with God at the beginning and helm of it all. You're building a house of cards and hiding behind technical babble. Evolution does not happen. You cannot show one single proof that evolution happens in the sense you believe.

And sorry, it is perfectly legitimate to ask what an animals is "turning into." Yes, I know we have conventions to categorize everything, blah blah blah, but everything (that is, EVERYTHING) is fully function, doing just what it was designed to do in its environment.

So, you know, think about it, there's a thing called luck. In all of the billions and trillions of living things that have existed, why has there never been something that survived despite having poor form with it's environment? Or that just eeked out an existence, but would be clearly seen as not very well adapted? Oh, because you have this theory about "survival of the fittest?" Okay, how do I measure that? Just look at humans today. Plenty of us survive, despite not being the best of the best of the best. So, where are all these creatures that are just not quite so perfect in their environment? They just all died, I guess. None of their fossils were preserved, though. Only the best of the best is what we see. If evolution were true (which is most definitely not) the world would look like a huge disgusting mess (and that's allowing an actual mechanism for it to even work). And this should especially speak to you, considering how you talk of all things being singular, and in some stage of transition. It'd be a huge mess. You haven't really tried your theory out. But the world is beautiful, and we all see it, and know that God is behind it all.

I will leave you with a video. I feel like if we have no baseline then there's not much point, so if you watch it, I'll respond. Otherwise, I'll leave it at this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zU7Lww-sBPg