Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I'd say that's a good thing. If prosecutors don't want family autopsies entered as evidence, that can only mean one thing - The autopsies are bull-shit and would not stand up to cross examination.

The prosecution is holding back phony reports the MSM used to publicly villify a cop.

Is the trial going to be televised? This trial, more than any other in recent history, should be.

As a country, we should know all the facts so we can determine whether burning down major cities is justified or not - based on conviction or acquittal.

34 days ago
9 score
Reason: Original

I'd say that's a good thing. If prosecutors don't want family autopsies entered as evidence, that can only mean one thing - The autopsies are bull-shit and would not stand up to cross examination.

The prosecution is holding back phony reports the MSM used to publicly villify a cop.

Is the trial going to be televised? This trial, more than any other in recent history, should be.

As a country, we should know all the facts so we can determine whether burning down major cities is justified or not based on conviction or acquittal.

34 days ago
1 score