Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I actually don't. The 'source' is a highly biased individual. who is neither a scientist nor a statician. On the other end of the spectrum, there's a TON of debunks, but almost all are SIMILARLY highly politicized, so I don't really care to post them. I'll be goddamned to put snopes on here, anyway.

I do see some things, like the rise in Indian polio arising from a single study, that was later countered and pointed out it was a statistical confirmation bias issue, not a Gates foundation problem.

That said, I don't care to defend Bill Gates, so I'm not going to waste any more time on this. Feel free to believe Robert F Kennedy Jr. Also, it's bad karma to disagree with conspiracy theories here.

Edit - I did find ONE reasonable source IRT Gates Polio - https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-conspiracy-bill-gates-infowars-2020-4?op=1

329 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I actually don't. The 'source' is a highly biased individual. who is neither a scientist nor a statician. On the other end of the spectrum, there's a TON of debunks, but almost all are SIMILARLY highly politicized, so I don't really care to post them.

I do see some things, like the rise in Indian polio arising from a single study, that was later countered and pointed out it was a statistical confirmation bias issue, not a Gates foundation problem.

That said, I don't care to defend Bill Gates, so I'm not going to waste any more time on this. Feel free to believe Robert F Kennedy Jr. Also, it's bad karma to disagree with conspiracy theories here.

Edit - I did find ONE reasonable source IRT Gates Polio - https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-conspiracy-bill-gates-infowars-2020-4?op=1

329 days ago
1 score
Reason: Added a non-biased source

I actually don't. The 'source' is a highly biased individual. On the other end of the spectrum, there's a TON of debunks, but almost all are SIMILARLY highly politicized, so I don't really care to post them.

I do see some things, like the rise in Indian polio arising from a single study, that was later countered and pointed out it was a statistical confirmation bias issue, not a Gates foundation problem.

That said, I don't care to defend Bill Gates, so I'm not going to waste any more time on this. Feel free to believe Robert F Kennedy Jr. Also, it's bad karma to disagree with conspiracy theories here.

Edit - I did find ONE reasonable source IRT Gates Polio - https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-conspiracy-bill-gates-infowars-2020-4?op=1

329 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I actually don't. The 'source' is a highly biased individual. On the other end of the spectrum, there's a TON of debunks, but almost all are SIMILARLY highly politicized, so I don't really care to post them.

I do see some things, like the rise in Indian polio arising from a single study, that was later countered and pointed out it was a statistical confirmation bias issue, not a Gates foundation problem.

That said, I don't care to defend Bill Gates, so I'm not going to waste any more time on this. Feel free to believe Robert F Kennedy Jr. Also, it's bad karma to disagree with conspiracy theories here.

329 days ago
1 score