No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund."

People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal, and the cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population and push coordinated propaganda are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient to shutdown. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out enough to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about another guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund."

People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal, and the cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population and push coordinated propaganda are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient to shutdown. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about another guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. The cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population and push coordinated propaganda are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient to shutdown. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about another guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. The cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population and push coordinated propaganda are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient to shutdown. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until they try to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. The cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population and push coordinated propaganda are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient to shutdown. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. The cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population and push coordinated propaganda are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund."

People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal, and the cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. The cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority. Heck, we even have tone-deaf conservatives and libertarians defending big tech as if international public corporations colluding with each other, NGO's, and politicians to censor half the population are the same in principle as a sole proprietorship local bakery run by Christians with deeply held religious principles. Conservatives are nowhere NEAR the level of "fed up" yet that they need to be.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. The cognitive dissonance is off the charts. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by their mouth-breathing peers. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by the mouth-breathing crowd. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've already seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer...or some kind of report about right-wing terrorism that wasn't a total fabrication or massive exaggeration for once.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would currently risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by the mouth-breathing crowd. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.

We need to organize better to sustain any form of resistance whatsoever, and I think you know this, deep down. If you didn't, I would've seen something on the news about some guy in a Killdozer.

No matter what means we use to win, we need more people...and if you have the people to win violently, you typically have the people to win via peaceful civil disobedience, unless/until the other side tries to massacre you for trying.

Half the population leans our way, but precious few truly understand the cost of capitulation enough yet to maintain disciplined resolve through thick and thin. I fear you severely overestimate how many people would risk their lives and offer material support in the absence of a cohesive organizational support structure. Without this, any support from the passive population would be short-lived. When the neighborhood children are becoming collateral damage in an armed conflict between a totalitarian government and maligned terrorists and the only news people ever hear is bad, it doesn't take long before they pray for it to end no matter the cost, "For the children."

Your level of commitment and determination is WAY ahead of the curve here, and projecting it onto other people is the same kind of fatal mistake that smart kids make right before they say/do something that gets them dogpiled by the mouth-breathing crowd. The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut by the lawnmower. Things have to get a LOT worse before enough people wake up to provide the levels of material support seen in e.g. the Revolutionary War.

How do I know people aren't at the point of taking huge risks yet? Because too few are even willing to take small token risks. People keep their viewpoints to themselves under their own names, because they're afraid of being canceled and know that nobody will stick up for them in unison. We don't have the level of social organization to have each other's backs on any level, and most people just grimace and think, "Glad it's not me." We don't even have sufficient people to keep churches open and tell arresting officers and municipal functionaries to shove it (or even to say, "I'm willing to be arrested for this"). There's too much, "But muh job, muh credit rating, muh retirement fund." People are still invested in the system and praying things magically go back to normal. We still have conservatives and libertarians waxing poetic about some globalist corporation's absolute private property rights to make us wear masks to buy groceries, as if we're still living in a stable peacetime society where that should be our priority.

You may doubt that a third of our organized military would actively engage the public, but the brass is actively purging anyone from the military for wrongthink, which makes room for Woke jackboots. Their replacement grunts may not be as disciplined as GWOT vets, but they hold the territory and the crew-served weapons.

The alternative option is for a significant percentage of the population to actively work to organize and become economically independent of the subverted institutions before they get the death camps running. We need to make our communications infrastructure more resilient. We need to start standing up together to keep our churches open, and to understand how to work together and rely on each other to stand strong together. If we have enough people to win a ground war, we have enough people to win with civil disobedience, unless/until it freaks them out to massacre us all; and then, because we took the time to organize, we'll be much more ready.