Well that's an inflammatory statement. The actual statement is that they're holding up state's rights to limit right to carry by their own laws:

State governments have the right to limit the right of individuals to carry guns in public, requiring them to show urgency or need and be of "high moral character," the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found on Wednesday, dismissing an action challenging Hawaii's firearm licensing law.

"The en banc court affirmed the district court's dismissal of an action challenging Hawaii's firearm licensing law, Hawaii Revised Statutes � 134-9(a), which requires that residents seeking a license to openly carry a firearm in public must demonstrate the urgency or the need to carry a firearm, must be of good moral character and must be 'engaged in the protection of life and property,'" the court said.

EDIT: It also took me less than 1 minute to research this. People really need to stop taking tweets, from anyone but especially someone as politically motivated as the NRA, at face value.

Well that's an inflammatory statement. The actual statement is that they're holding up state's rights to limit right to carry by their own laws:

State governments have the right to limit the right of individuals to carry guns in public, requiring them to show urgency or need and be of "high moral character," the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit found on Wednesday, dismissing an action challenging Hawaii's firearm licensing law.

"The en banc court affirmed the district court's dismissal of an action challenging Hawaii's firearm licensing law, Hawaii Revised Statutes � 134-9(a), which requires that residents seeking a license to openly carry a firearm in public must demonstrate the urgency or the need to carry a firearm, must be of good moral character and must be 'engaged in the protection of life and property,'" the court said.