This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I managed when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's somewhat funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for stepping in and solving it my way as well as doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under their control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore. In real life I've quite often bumped into people, they'll say things like "Oh I use reddit, do you use that?", it's not really niche anymore like when the internet was younger. Now I tell people "No, I don't use paedophile networks."

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I managed when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's somewhat funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for stepping in and solving it my way as well as doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore. In real life I've quite often bumped into people, they'll say things like "Oh I use reddit, do you use that?", it's not really niche anymore like when the internet was younger. Now I tell people "No, I don't use paedophile networks."

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I managef when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's somewhat funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for stepping in and solving it my way as well as doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore. In real life I've quite often bumped into people, they'll say things like "Oh I use reddit, do you use that?", it's not really niche anymore like when the internet was younger. Now I tell people "No, I don't use paedophile networks."

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's somewhat funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for stepping in and solving it my way as well as doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore. In real life I've quite often bumped into people, they'll say things like "Oh I use reddit, do you use that?", it's not really niche anymore like when the internet was younger. Now I tell people "No, I don't use paedophile networks."

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's somewhat funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for stepping in and solving it my way as well as doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore. In real life I've quite often bumped into people, they'll say things like "Oh I use reddit, do you use that?", it's not really niche anymore like when the internet was younger. Now I tell people "No, I don't join paedophile networks."

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore. In real life I've quite often bumped into people, they'll say things like "Oh I use reddit, do you use that?", it's not really niche anymore like when the internet was younger. Now I tell people "No, I don't use paedophile networks."

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore. In real life I've quite often bumped into people, they'll say things like "Oh I use reddit, do you use that?", it's not really niche anymore like when the internet was younger. Now I tell people "No, I don't join paedophile networks."

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? Banning their victims? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. It was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes. You don't give in to terrorism, period.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant and criminal activity.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. I was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. I was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals, specifically their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. I was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. I was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for stepping in, solving it my way and doing the right thing. It was all quickly forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

It's some what funny because in a situation very much identical to reddit's I was once disciplined by management of a company I worked for for solving it my way and doing the right thing. I was all forgotten when surprise surprise the problem went away. They were brought under control and were not allowed to bring us under our control. Reddit on the other hand obviously has no competent staff to protect management from their egregious mistakes.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? Letting extremist fanatics dictate rules and policy? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it. Making the biggest problem users mods and admins? I'd come down on them like a ton of bricks.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it.

I'm not at all surprised by the way things are turning out now and there's a reason I don't use reddit anymore.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board.

On services I manage when you have millions of people some of them will be insane. Many will be unhappy. Sometimes, things do go wrong or you get things wrong with your products and you have to handle that.

I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong).

It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board. At the time coming from this position and level of expertise the things reddit was doing were things that if someone I was managing I had done in the position I was in with the roles reverse they would have been sacked for it.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

When I was shadow banned I wasn't a kid. At that time I was a professional running other sites as part of my job and forums relating to our products with millions of users. I've had to manage the same kinds of crusades and extremely hostile users and the one thing you never do is bring them on board. One services I manage when you have millionsof people some of them will be insane. I was the one that had to deal with things like them maliciously posting CP (that would usually mean sending all their details to the FBI, sometimes implementing ways to prevent it and also detect them through proxies) not as a "community manager" but responsible for technical solutions and the audit trail (though on occasion would also negotiate with the terrorists but give them nothing, when they're wrong they're wrong). It is however something CEOs and managers often consider or propose. What I saw with reddit looked to me like they took the wrong path and brought them on board.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after. Basically it looks like they were rewarded with positions of power.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too. I believe after.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies (the aggressors who had gone on the attack in the name of feminism). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only one side, the trannies (basically the aggressors who had gone on the attack). I was on the fence but it was easy to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.

I remember trannies were taking over around ten years ago and reddit just bowed to their cyber terrorism. If I remember they had added one or two on their staff around then too.

Things like during the whole creepshots thing I remember they went on a massive campaign to protect only on side, the trannies. I was on the fence but it was clear to observe them getting into bed with extremists on one specific side. Perhaps they were in with them the entire time. Who knows.

This has been going on for years. I remember I believe roughly ten years ago I was shadow banned, an inhumane practice not considered appropriate for anything but the most extreme cases for what?

Opposing and speaking out against transsexuals and their militant activism.

Though occasionally a little heated at best, nothing at all extreme or out of the ordinary. Just on the wrong side of an argument they couldn't win.

They've done this to who knows how many users. There's no transparency but the campaign must have been and must still be enormous.

Years after that I vaguely remember how they were going on about how they only used shadow bans for the kinds of reasons you'd expect them to be used for but they've blatantly been lying.