She vetoed a bill that would have become law, and instead signed executive orders that could be easily overturned in the future. I don't pretend to know what she is thinking or why, for all I know she may have a good reason. But for her to veto a bill that is very popular in her state, and pass couple of potentially toothless executive orders is fishy at best.

If she is trying to be MAGA, she is not very convincing. If she isn't willing to stand up and fight for her constituents (vetoed the bill because she was afraid of getting sued, or so she claimed), what makes you think she'll fight for you? Will she risk the wrath of a WaPo op-ed to defend our principles, or will she fold like a wet towel? I'm not confident. She may not yet be Nikki!, but she's getting there.

She vetoed a bill that would have become law, and instead signed executive orders that could be easily overturned in the future. I don't pretend to know what she is thinking or why, for all I know she may have a good reason. But for her to veto a bill that is very popular in her state, and pass couple of potentially toothless executive orders is fishy at best.

If she is trying to be MAGA, she is not very convincing. If she isn't willing to stand up and fight for her constituents (vetoed the bill because she was afraid of getting sued, or so she claimed), what makes you think she'll fight for you? Will she risk the wrath of a WaPo op-ed to defend our principles, or will she fold like a wet towel? I'm not confident. She may not yet be Nikki!, but she's getting there.

She vetoed a bill that would have become law, and instead signed executive orders that could be easily overturned in the future. I don't pretend to know what she is thinking or why, for all I know she may have a good reason. But for her to veto a bill that is very popular in her state, and pass couple of potentially toothless executive orders is fishy at best.

If she is trying to be MAGA, she is not very convincing. If she isn't willing to stand up and fight for her constituents (vetoed the bill because she was afraid of getting sued, or do she claimed), what makes you think she'll fight for you? Will she risk the wrath of a WaPo op-ed to defend our principles, or will she fold like a wet towel? I'm not confident. She may not yet be Nikki!, but she's getting there.

She vetoed a bill that would have become law, and instead signed executive orders that could be easily overturned in the future. I don't pretend to know what she is thinking or why, for all I know she may have a good reason. But for her to veto a bill that is very popular in her state, and pass couple of potentially toothless executive orders is fishy at best.