I generally don't believe in God. However there is a major problem in science. They say that the universe is nothing but physics.

That is not true. I can directly observe being conscious. That is for example that I feel pain for real. Then phenomena does not exist in physics. Yet it does exist.

If that phenomena exists in the brain then you cannot rule out it being found else where in the universe. After all when you look at the brain you don't find any material that couldn't be elsewhere in the universe.

The state of the universe prior to the big bang is completely unknown. We cannot rule out some conscious phenomena having effect the physical universe we see today. That could also pertain to having influenced the rules of the universe.

Such a notion is really challenging and most scientists not only abandon it but ignore it through hubris because they don't like the idea of there being something they can never know or figure out.

If such a force did exist the possibilities are endless. I would not assume automatically the common anthropomorphic entity, nor one that still exists not whose intentions match the reality we experience. Some of the possibilities are quite disturbing.

Consciousness does not have to exist in a state that matches reality. You can dream or hallucinate. There is a theoretically valid theory for the brain to have evolved around exploiting the potential for consciousness in things that exist and for that conscious effect to match reality.

If at the beginning of the universe you have consciousness all entwined with matter and energy (in some ways the same thing) it wouldn't be evolved like we. We have no basis to assume it has what we have. Instead you could have something existing in terminal and complete detachment from reality dreaming while also influencing the early evolution of the universe. Exactly what that would look like and be like could be almost insanity inducing.

There is a very real subjective as well as objective universe. We exist as a subjective component of the universe which experiences it objectively. Why would these two components not have existed from the beginning? What's particularly disturbing is the dehumanisation of science saying that only the objective universe exists.

Down the line that's going to be a growing threat. The irony is their hubris has denied them the opportunity to figure out that conscious almost certainly heavily interplays with evolution and is not a passive component. They focus only on intelligence. I seem to be the only one who has presented that particular theory of evolution.

I generally don't believe in God. However there is a major problem in science. They say that the universe is nothing but physics.

That is not true. I can directly observe being conscious. That is for example that I feel pain for real. Then phenomena does not exist in physics. Yet it does exist.

If that phenomena exists in the brain then you cannot rule out it being found else where in the universe. After all when you look at the brain you don't find any material that couldn't be elsewhere in the universe.

The state of the universe prior to the big bang is completely unknown. We cannot rule out some conscious phenomena having effect the physical universe we see today. That could also pertain to having influenced the rules of the universe.

Such a notion is really challenging and most scientists not only abandon it but ignore it through hubris because they don't like the idea of there being something they can never know or figure out.

If such a force did exist the possibilities are endless. I would not assume automatically the common anthropomorphic entity, nor one that still exists not whose intentions match the reality we experience. Some of the possibilities are quite disturbing.

Consciousness does not have to exist in a state that matches reality. You can dream or hallucinate. There is a theoretically valid theory for the brain to have evolved around exploiting the potential for consciousness in things that exist and for that conscious effect to match reality.

If at the beginning of the universe you have consciousness all entwined with matter and energy (in some ways the same thing) it wouldn't be evolved like we. We have no basis to assume it has what we have. Instead you could have something existing in terminal and complete detachment from reality dreaming while also influencing the early evolution of the universe. Exactly what that would look like and be like could be almost insanity inducing.

There is a very real subjective as well as objective universe. We exist as a subjective component of the universe which experiences it objectively. Why would these two components not have existed from the beginning? What's particularly disturbing is the dehumanisation of science saying that only the objective universe exists.

Down the line that's going to be a growing threat. The irony is their hubris has denied them the opportunity to figure out that conscious almost certainly heavily interplays with evolution and is not a passive component. They focus only on intelligence. I seem to be one of the only ones who has presented that particular theory of evolution.

I generally don't believe in God. However there is a major problem in science. They say that the universe is nothing but physics.

That is not true. I can directly observe being conscious. That is for example that I feel pain for real. Then phenomena does not exist in physics. Yet it does exist.

If that phenomena exists in the brain then you cannot rule out it being found else where in the universe. After all when you look at the brain you don't find any material that couldn't be elsewhere in the universe.

The state of the universe prior to the big bang is completely unknown. We cannot rule out some conscious phenomena having effect the physical universe we see today. That could also pertain to having influenced the rules of the universe.

Such a notion is really challenging and most scientists not only abandon it but ignore it through hubris because they don't like the idea of there being something they can never know or figure out.

If such a force did exist the possibilities are endless. I would not assume automatically the common anthropomorphic entity, nor one that still exists not whose intentions match the reality we experience. Some of the possibilities are quite disturbing.

Consciousness does not have to exist in a state that matches reality. You can dream or hallucinate. There is a theoretically valid theory for the brain to have evolved around exploiting the potential for consciousness in things that exist and for that conscious effect to match reality.

If at the beginning of the universe you have consciousness all entwined with matter and energy (in some ways the same thing) it wouldn't be evolved like we. We have no basis to assume it has what we have. Instead you could have something existing in terminal and complete detachment from reality dreaming while also influencing the early evolution of the universe. Exactly what that would look like and be like could be almost insanity inducing.

There is a very real subjective as well as objective universe. We exist as a subjective component of the universe which experiences it objectively. Why would these two components not have existed from the beginning? What's particularly disturbing is the dehumanisation of science saying that only the objective universe exists.

Down the line that's going to be a growing threat. The irony is their hubris has prevented them figuring out that conscious almost certainly heavily interplays with evolution and is not a passive component. They focus only on intelligence. I seem to be one of the only ones who has presented that particular theory of evolution.

I generally don't believe in God. However there is a major problem in science. They say that the universe is nothing but physics.

That is not true. I can directly observe being conscious. That is for example that I feel pain for real. Then phenomena does not exist in physics. Yet it does exist.

If that phenomena exists in the brain then you cannot rule out it being found else where in the universe. After all when you look at the brain you don't find any material that couldn't be elsewhere in the universe.

The state of the universe prior to the big bang is completely unknown. We cannot rule out some conscious phenomena having effect the physical universe we see today. That could also pertain to having influenced the rules of the universe.

Such a notion is really challenging and most scientists not only abandon it but ignore it through hubris because they don't like the idea of there being something they can never know or figure out.

If such a force did exist the possibilities are endless. I would not assume automatically the common anthropomorphic entity, nor one that still exists not whose intentions match the reality we experience. Some of the possibilities are quite disturbing.

Consciousness does not have to exist in a state that matches reality. You can dream or hallucinate. There is a theoretically valid theory for the brain to have evolved around exploiting the potential for consciousness in things that exist and for that conscious effect to match reality.

If at the beginning of the universe you have consciousness all entwined with matter and energy (in some ways the same thing) it wouldn't be evolved like we. We have no basis to assume it has what we have. Instead you could have something existing in terminal and complete detachment from reality dreaming while also influencing the early evolution of the universe. Exactly what that would look like and be like could be almost insanity inducing.

There is a very real subjective as well as objective universe. We exist as a subjective component of the universe which experiences it objectively. Why would these two components not have existed from the beginning? What's particularly disturbing is the dehumanisation of science saying that only the objective universe exists.

Down the line that's going to be a growing threat.

I generally don't believe in God. However there is a major problem in science. They say that the universe is nothing but physics.

That is not true. I can directly observe being conscious. That is for example that I feel pain for real. Then phenomena does not exist in physics. Yet it does exist.

If that phenomena exists in the brain then you cannot rule out it being found else where in the universe. After all when you look at the brain you don't find any material that couldn't be elsewhere in the universe.

The state of the universe prior to the big bang is completely unknown. We cannot rule out some conscious phenomena having effect the physical universe we see today. That could also pertain to having influenced the rules of the universe.

Such a notion is really challenging and most scientists not only abandon it but ignore it through hubris because they don't like the idea of there being something they can never know or figure out.

If such a force did exist the possibilities are endless. I would not assume automatically the common anthropomorphic entity, nor one that still exists not whose intentions match the reality we experience. Some of the possibilities are quite disturbing.

Consciousness does not have to exist in a state that matches reality. You can dream or hallucinate. There is a theoretically valid theory for the brain to have evolved around exploiting the potential for consciousness in things that exist and for that conscious effect to match reality.

If at the beginning of the universe you have consciousness all entwined with matter and energy (in some ways the same thing) it wouldn't be evolved like we. We have no basis to assume it has what we have. Instead you could have something existing in terminal and complete detachment from reality dreaming while also influencing the early evolution of the universe. Exactly what that would look like and be like could be almost insanity inducing.

There is a very real subjective as well as objective universe. We exist as a subjective component of the universe which experiences it objectively. Why would these two components not have existed from the beginning?

I generally don't believe in God. However there is a major problem in science. They say that the universe is nothing but physics.

That is not true. I can directly observe being conscious. That is for example that I feel pain for real. Then phenomena does not exist in physics. Yet it does exist. There is a very real subjective as well as objective universe.

If that phenomena exists in the brain then you cannot rule out it being found else where in the universe. After all when you look at the brain you don't find any material that couldn't be elsewhere in the universe.

The state of the universe prior to the big bang is completely unknown. We cannot rule out some conscious phenomena having effect the physical universe we see today. That could also pertain to having influenced the rules of the universe.

Such a notion is really challenging and most scientists not only abandon it but ignore it through hubris because they don't like the idea of there being something they can never know or figure out.

If such a force did exist the possibilities are endless. I would not assume automatically the common anthropomorphic entity, nor one that still exists not whose intentions match the reality we experience. Some of the possibilities are quite disturbing.

Consciousness does not have to exist in a state that matches reality. You can dream or hallucinate. There is a theoretically valid theory for the brain to have evolved around exploiting the potential for consciousness in things that exist and for that conscious effect to match reality.

If at the beginning of the universe you have consciousness all entwined with matter and energy (in some ways the same thing) it wouldn't be evolved like we. We have no basis to assume it has what we have. Instead you could have something existing in terminal and complete detachment from reality dreaming while also influencing the early evolution of the universe. Exactly what that would look like and be like could be almost insanity inducing.