The thing is most atheists think they're Darwin and Einstein just because they've heard of it and some of the basics.

Evolution is incredibly complex and while it might preclude Genesis being literal (which it obviously isn't nor does it make much sense for it to go into brutal detail explaining all the complex mathematics and processes of evolution to get the point across) it doesn't preclude a God. Why wouldn't a God that is so intelligent and powerful use evolution? There's far too much presumption.

Evolution is a fact. I use it myself and work with algorithms. It's perceivable everywhere. I would argue that if you believe in God you're denying his work by denying evolution. As someone who enjoys intellectual pursuits, it's not something that I would find entirely unintelligent. When I intelligently design, I use evolutionary processes sometimes. People pay me for it sometimes.

There's no sufficient deficit in the fossil record to disqualify it. That argument is like saying there isn't a galaxy because of the gaps between the stars. There's a good progression showing evolutionary steps.

Similar if people are treating Genesis literally and they believe in God I think that's said because Genesis has some interesting things to say and consider so if he is trying to speak to them they're struggling to translate.

The thing is most atheists think they're Darwin and Einstein just because they've heard of it and some of the basics.

Evolution is incredibly complex and while it might preclude Genesis being literal (which it obviously isn't nor does it make much sense for it to go into brutal detail explaining all the complex mathematics and processes of evolution to get the point across) it doesn't preclude a God. Why wouldn't a God that is so intelligent and powerful use evolution? There's far too much presumption.

Evolution is a fact. I use it myself and work with algorithms. It's perceivable everywhere. I would argue that if you believe in God you're denying his work by denying evolution. As someone who enjoys intellectual pursuits, it's not something that I would find entirely unintelligent. When I intelligently design, I use evolutionary processes sometimes. People pay me for it sometimes.

Similar if people are treating Genesis literally and they believe in God I think that's sad because Genesis has some interesting things to say and consider so if he is trying to speak to them they're struggling to translate.

The thing is most atheists think they're Darwin and Einstein just because they've heard of it and some of the basics.

Evolution is incredibly complex and while it might preclude Genesis being literal (which it obviously isn't nor does it make much sense for it to go into brutal detail explaining all the complex mathematics and processes of evolution to get the point across) it doesn't preclude a God. Why wouldn't a God that is so intelligent and powerful use evolution? There's far too much presumption.

Evolution is a fact. I use it myself and work with algorithms. It's perceivable everywhere. I would argue that if you believe in God you're denying his work by denying evolution. As someone who enjoys intellectual pursuits, it's not something that I would find entirely unintelligent. When I intelligently design, I use evolutionary processes sometimes. People pay me for it sometimes.

Similar if people are treating Genesis literally and they believe in God I think that's said because Genesis has some interesting things to say and consider so if he is trying to speak to them they're struggling to translate.

The thing is most atheists think they're Darwin and Einstein just because they've heard of it and some of the basics.

Evolution is incredibly complex and while it might preclude Genesis being literal (which it obviously isn't nor does it make much sense for it to go into brutal detail explaining all the complex mathematics and processes of evolution to get the point across) it doesn't preclude a God. Why wouldn't a God that is so intelligent and powerful use evolution? There's far too much presumption.

Evolution is a fact. I use it myself and work with algorithms. It's perceivable everywhere. I would argue that if you believe in God you're denying his work by denying evolution. As someone who enjoys intellectual pursuits, it's not something that I would find entirely unintelligent. When I intelligently design, I use evolutionary processes sometimes. People pay me for it sometimes.

Similar if people are treating Genesis literally and they believe in God I think that's said because Genesis has some interesting things to say and consider so if he is trying to speak to them they're struggling to translate.