Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Thank you for this and shame on Lancet.

It just may be that the ZINC mechanism where it inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity is the only significant anti-COVID mechanism.

Then HCQ given by itself without supplementing ZINC would therefore do nothing unless by chance the patient had a great deal of ZINC when they arrived at the hospital. But just as possible, failure to supplement zinc would result in ever decreasing levels. And perhaps the amount of ZINC required for HCQ to be effective is only obtained by giving the two together.

The completed drug trials may be correct in finding no efficacy in HCQ alone or combined with other things that do not contain ZINC such as azithromycin but yet also broken because a ZINC ionophore is being given without -- or even controlling for -- ZINC.

I pored over this latest Lancet study for all of 10 seconds. Its appendix another 10 seconds. Do you realize that this known zinc ionophore's study text has not one mention of zinc? We are now completely in RESEARCH CLOWN WORLD, for the background of such studies usually contains references to essential research that has been conducted for the disease at hand.

Someone has picked this document clean of any reference to ZINC.

The sheer number of such studies and trials has compelled me to cry murder. See my own essy/rant The Hydroxychloroquine ZINC-less murders for more.

325 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Thank you for this and shame on Lancet.

It just may be that the ZINC mechanism where it inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity is the only significant anti-COVID mechanism.

Then HCQ given by itself without supplementing ZINC would therefore do nothing unless by chance the patient had a great deal of ZINC when they arrived at the hospital. But just as possible, failure to supplement zinc would result in ever decreasing levels. And perhaps the amount of ZINC required for HCQ to be effective is only obtained by giving the two together.

The completed drug trials may be correct in finding no efficacy in HCQ alone or combined with other things that do not contain ZINC such as azithromycin but yet also broken because a ZINC ionophore is being given without -- or even controlling for -- ZINC.

I pored over this latest Lancet study for all of 10 seconds. Its appendix another 10 seconds. Do you realize that this known zinc ionophore's study text has not one mention of zinc? We are now completely in RESEARCH CLOWN WORLD, for the background of such studies usually contains references to essential research that has been conducted for the disease at hand.

Someone has picked this document clean of any reference to ZINC.

The sheer number of such studies and trials has compelled me to cry murder. See my own essy/rant The Hydroxychloroquine ZINC-less murders for more. EDIT: HERE is a cleaner version with more research.

327 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Thank you for this and shame on Lancet.

It just may be that the ZINC mechanism where it inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity is the only significant anti-COVID mechanism.

Then HCQ given by itself without supplementing ZINC would therefore do nothing unless by chance the patient had a great deal of ZINC when they arrived at the hospital. But just as possible, failure to supplement zinc would result in ever decreasing levels. And perhaps the amount of ZINC required for HCQ to be effective is only obtained by giving the two together.

The completed drug trials may be correct in finding no efficacy in HCQ alone or combined with other things that do not contain ZINC such as azithromycin but yet also broken because a ZINC ionophore is being given without -- or even controlling for -- ZINC.

I pored over this latest Lancet study for all of 10 seconds. Its appendix another 10 seconds. Do you realize that this known zinc ionophore's study text has not one mention of zinc? We are now completely in RESEARCH CLOWN WORLD, for the background of such studies usually contains references to essential research that has been conducted for the disease at hand.

Someone has picked this document clean of any reference to ZINC.

The sheer number of such studies and trials has compelled me to cry murder. See my own essy/rant The Hydroxychloroquine ZINC-less murders for more.

327 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It just may be that the ZINC mechanism where it inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity is the only significant anti-COVID mechanism.

Then HCQ given by itself without supplementing ZINC would therefore do nothing unless by chance the patient had a great deal of ZINC when they arrived at the hospital. But just as possible, failure to supplement zinc would result in ever decreasing levels. And perhaps the amount of ZINC required for HCQ to be effective is only obtained by giving the two together.

The completed drug trials may be correct in finding no efficacy in HCQ alone or combined with other things that do not contain ZINC such as azithromycin but yet also broken because a ZINC ionophore is being given without -- or even controlling for -- ZINC.

I pored over this latest Lancet study for all of 10 seconds. Its appendix another 10 seconds. Do you realize that this known zinc ionophore's study text has not one mention of zinc? We are now completely in RESEARCH CLOWN WORLD, for the background of such studies usually contains references to essential research that has been conducted for the disease at hand.

Someone has picked this document clean of any reference to ZINC.

The sheer number of such trials has compelled me to cry murder. See my own essy/rant The Hydroxychloroquine ZINC-less murders for more.

327 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

It just may be that the ZINC mechanism where it inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity is the only significant anti-COVID mechanism.

Then HCQ given by itself without supplementing ZINC would therefore do nothing unless by chance the patient had a great deal of ZINC when they arrived at the hospital. But just as possible, failure to supplement zinc would result in ever decreasing levels. And perhaps the amount of ZINC required for HCQ to be effective is only obtained by giving the two together.

The completed drug trials may be correct in finding no efficacy in HCQ alone or combined with other things that do not contain ZINC such as azithromycin) but yet also broken because a ZINC ionophore is being given without -- or even controlling for -- ZINC.

I pored over this latest Lancet study for all of 10 seconds. Its appendix another 10 seconds. Do you realize that this known zinc ionophore's study text has not one mention of zinc? We are now completely in RESEARCH CLOWN WORLD, for the background of such studies usually contains references to essential research that has been conducted for the disease at hand.

Someone has picked this document clean of any reference to ZINC.

The sheer number of such trials has compelled me to cry murder. See my own essy/rant The Hydroxychloroquine ZINC-less murders for more.

327 days ago
1 score