I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.

Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO. They believe in global authority over independence or sovereignty.

I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.

Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO. They believe in global authority over independence or sovereignty.

I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.

Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO. They believe in global authority over independence or sovereignty.

I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.

Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO. They believe in global authority over independence or sovereignty.

I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.

Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO. They believe in global authority over independence or sovereignty.

I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.

Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO. They believe in global authority over independence or sovereignty.

I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.

Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO.

I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.

Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.

National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.

You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.

National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.