We need the CDA 230 laws to go.

If these platform/publishers want to censor and edit what's allowed on their sites, then they need to held liable for the content that their hosting and endorsing.

It's arguable that the CDA 230 laws are unconstitutional since the 1A prevents the government from making any laws that infringe on the 1A.

We need the CDA 230 laws to go.

If these platform/publishers want to censor and edit what's allowed on their sites, then they need to held liable for the content that their hosting and endorsing.

It's arguable that the CDA 230 laws are unconstitutional since the 1A prevents the government from making any laws that infringe on the 1A.

We need the CDA 230 laws to go.

If these platform/publishers want to censor and edit what's allowed on their sites, then they need to held liable for the content that their hosting and endorsing.

It's arguable that the CDA 230 laws are unconstitutional since the 1A prevents the government from making any laws that infringe on the 1A.

(it doesn't actually specify that the laws created must pertain to government entities, it simply states that government cannot make laws that infringe on the 1A)