All of your theories assume a level of consistency that doesn't exist. The scales might have fallen from my eyes but most people trust the court implicitly and that's not an illusion they want to shatter if they can avoid it. They will inherently want to ensnare him in the grey zone.

The forces usually go for minimum effect required and when it seems like it's not that's because the minimum is quite high.

In this case all they need is guilt, even if by the minimum standard to justify the crusade they went on. If they get even the lowest charge it will sustain their confirmation bias.

There's a lot of retardation around but don't attribute everything to that at the core. What they're doing really becomes a necessity if they really did release the virus themselves and steal the election.

The thing is you have to understand, sometimes the only arguments you can make are stupid ones but not because you're stupid.

Lets say I do something I can't explain intelligently to others such as I steal something because I'm greedy. I will probably only be left with stupid explanations. I'm going to have to explain something incongruent with reality.

What you're seeing is not always a difference in intelligence. Out of the two positions one is intellectually easy to maintain and one is intellectually difficult to maintain.

It's a lot easier to convince people you're not stealing when you're not stealing.

All of your theories assume a level of consistency that doesn't exist. The scales might have fallen from my eyes but most people trust the court implicitly and that's not an illusion they want to shatter if they can avoid it. They will inherently want to ensnare him in the grey zone.

The forces usually go for minimum effect required and when it seems like it's not that's because the minimum is quite high.

In this case all they need is guilt, even if by the minimum standard to justify the crusade they went on. If they get even the lowest charge it will sustain their confirmation bias.

There's a lot of retardation around but don't attribute everything to that at the core. What they're doing really becomes a necessity if they really did release the virus themselves and steal the election.

The thing is you have to understand, sometimes the only arguments you can make are stupid ones but not because you're stupid.

Lets say I do something I can't explain intelligently to others such as I steal something because I'm greedy. I will probably only be left with stupid explanations. I'm going to have to explain something incongruent with reality.