Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You have a theory that the jury isn't bribed. It might be based on some facts but also some assumptions or incorrect facts. Taking a hand full of what you believe to be facts then creating a theory based on it does not make the theory a fact as well. Your thinking diagnoses you as a member of a cluster of reddit tranny users.

This bizarre post looks like a psyop of suggestive arguments. All I see are subliminal messages like "Trust the jury." "Accept the verdict." "Do as we say." "We're one of you."

I see a lot of pointless padding and trick arguments. Pseudoreasoning, pseudofacts and pseudologic. The whole purpose appears to revolve around sneaking in those kinds of messages.

Anything other than innocent is unacceptable. There is reasonable doubt on all fronts and it's not people like who believe things and even convince themselves to easily, the believers rather than the doubters that are equipped to make the call. You simply can't take up a role that requires the ability to reason doubt when all you are doing is reasoning away doubt.

You spend all your effort questioning others but not yourself. You make glaring mistakes.

You've just slipped out the message that "BLM are the people."

You're busted.

11 days ago
0 score
Reason: None provided.

You have a theory that the jury isn't bribed. It might be based on some facts but also some assumptions or incorrect facts. Your thinking diagnoses you as a member of a cluster of reddit tranny users.

This bizarre post looks like a psyop of suggestive arguments. All I see are subliminal messages like "Trust the jury." "Accept the verdict." "Do as we say." "We're one of you."

I see a lot of pointless padding and trick arguments. Pseudoreasoning, pseudofacts and pseudologic. The whole purpose appears to revolve around sneaking in those kinds of messages.

Anything other than innocent is unacceptable. There is reasonable doubt on all fronts and it's not people like who believe things and even convince themselves to easily, the believers rather than the doubters that are equipped to make the call. You simply can't take up a role that requires the ability to reason doubt when all you are doing is reasoning away doubt.

You spend all your effort questioning others but not yourself. You make glaring mistakes.

You've just slipped out the message that "BLM are the people."

You're busted.

11 days ago
0 score
Reason: None provided.

You have a theory that the jury isn't bribed. It might be bases on some facts but also some assumptions or incorrect facts. Your thinking diagnoses you as a member of a cluster of reddit tranny users.

This bizarre post looks like a psyop of suggestive arguments. All I see are subliminal messages like "Trust the jury." "Accept the verdict." "Do as we say." "We're one of you."

I see a lot of pointless padding and trick arguments. Pseudoreasoning, pseudofacts and pseudologic. The whole purpose appears to revolve around sneaking in those kinds of messages.

Anything other than innocent is unacceptable. There is reasonable doubt on all fronts and it's not people like who believe things and even convince themselves to easily, the believers rather than the doubters that are equipped to make the call. You simply can't take up a role that requires the ability to reason doubt when all you are doing is reasoning away doubt.

You spend all your effort questioning others but not yourself. You make glaring mistakes.

You've just slipped out the message that "BLM are the people."

You're busted.

11 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You have a theory that the jury isn't bribed. It might be bases on some facts but also some assumptions or incorrect facts. Your thinking diagnoses you as a member of a cluster of reddit tranny users.

This bizarre post looks like a psyop of suggestive arguments. All I see are subliminal messages like "Trust the jury." "Accept the verdict." "Do as we say." "We're one of you."

I see a lot of pointless padding and trick arguments. Pseudoreasoning, pseudofacts and pseudologic. The whole purpose appears to revolve around sneaking in those kinds of messages.

Anything other than innocent is unacceptable. There is reasonable doubt on all fronts and it's not people like who believe things and even convince themselves to easily, the believers rather than the doubters that are equipped to make the call.

You spend all your effort questioning others but not yourself. You make glaring mistakes.

You've just slipped out the message that "BLM are the people."

You're busted.

11 days ago
1 score