Lolicon is short for Lolita complex which is defined as the sexual attraction towards young or pubescent girls, and the japanese spelling translates directly to "pedophile". Use as much mental gymnastics as you want, you're the only one pretending the sexualized petite bodied anime girl's design isn't meant to evoke the qualities of a child for the sexual gratification of pedophiles.

It's a freudian slip because the only people who would use the age of the character as an argument are people who think that it makes a difference as to whether or not it's a depiction of a child being sexualized, in other words if it was the exact same picture but the artist said "the character is 6 years old" then you'd admit that it is before going back to your "muh lines and colors, images have no meaning" retardation but since the intent behind loli depictions is to imitate the stylistic choices used in anime to depict children, then regardless of the contrived age or other extraneous details, it's a depiction of the body of a child being sexualized.

So objectively the age of the character doesn't matter but you believe it does because your belief that it does allows you to rationalize it as being 1 step further away from literal child porn to help you cope with the fact that you know that's exactly what it is.

Lolicon is short for Lolita complex which is defined as the sexual attraction towards young or pubescent girls, and the japanese spelling translates directly to "pedophile". Use as much mental gymnastics as you want, you're the only one pretending the petite bodied anime girl's design isn't meant to evoke the qualities of a child for the sexual gratification of pedophiles.

It's a freudian slip because the only people who would use the age of the character as an argument are people who think that it makes a difference as to whether or not it's a depiction of a child being sexualized, in other words if it was the exact same picture but the artist said "the character is 6 years old" then you'd admit that it is before going back to your "muh lines and colors, images have no meaning" retardation but since the intent behind loli depictions is to imitate the stylistic choices used in anime to depict children, then regardless of the contrived age or other extraneous details, it's a depiction of the body of a child being sexualized.

So objectively the age of the character doesn't matter but you believe it does because your belief that it does allows you to rationalize it as being 1 step further away from literal child porn to help you cope with the fact that you know that's exactly what it is.

Lolicon is short for Lolita complex which is defined as the sexual attraction towards young or pubescent girls. Use as much mental gymnastics as you want, you're the only one pretending the petite bodied anime girl's design isn't meant to evoke the qualities of a child for your sexual gratification.

Like I've said, it's not up for debate. You're a pedophile, therefore you should kill yourself.