People also have the right to make bad criticisms as well. At least up until a certain point until it's actionable so long as it's the subject to review, debate, criticism and rejection or acceptance without having to resort to force over discourse.

Traditionally in social encounters the first thing each party would do is reveal each of their assumptions and stereotypes about each other and just get it out in the open up front. Say if it's like that or not, have a laugh about it then get on with business.

People don't realise that anti-defamation really means anti-blasphemy and things like the ADL are an anti 1A organisation from inception. The problem is that even anti-defamation isn't necessarily a good thing. It very much depends on the venue, the error or potential error and the realistic implications. There is an odd effect where if you deny your opponent battle you deny yourself victory.

People get things wrong all the time about absolutely everything and while it's an important battle to fight that the moment your tool is purely one of authority and not trial by fire then you revoke your legitimate right to authority. Have an arena, but get rid of the fighters and merely keep the guy who announced the victor.

There aren't always single reasons for it. Sometimes Jews are racist just like everyone else is and have a natural tendency to hire those like them. It's a human tendency in general to associate with those you have common ground with, speak the same language, have the same references to draw from, follow similar codes, etc. Less impediment, more stream line.

In some cases it's because people assume everyone with a German/Jewish name is Jewish or follow a one drop rule not realising there are major cities with a significant founder effect of Germans in the USA and Jews as well that represent the hiring pool and Jews have long been well versus in advanced society, literacy, education, etc while Europe proper (not the Mediterranean, white Europe, the basin of France, Germany through Russia, Britain, Ireland, Scandinavia, etc) was a backwater being poked and prodded by the Romans still emerging from cataclysm due to huge turmoil in the shifting of terrain and biomes while also having enough vibrant land popping out from under the ice and snow after to stave off the need for advancement.

Genetically Jews appear to have a similar suitability to civilisation and biomes as Europeans making them relatively adept though they also appear to maintain good genetic intelligence as well possibly due to strong selection in their lineage and cultural procedures (basically self selective breeding). Jews have also always had their fingers in the pie being able to offer more higher level skills from an prior experience in more advanced nations getting there first to some degree and this was further enhanced by differences in moral codes as well as various forms of relativism (if you're a muslim you can't gamble but if you have westerners facilitate them gambling among each other and charge a service fee). They've got their foot in the door so to speak.

These details are really academic because what matters is in those positions anyone can be a problem. However you may need to approach it slightly differently for how human folly might play out for each group which each has its base cultural operating system installed and identity format. Some are going to be worse than others. We absolutely cannot allow Islam to dominate for example.

People have a simplistic view of Jews playing around with others using things like the Holocaust to always get the sympathy vote but that's only a small portion of reality that sometimes happens. It's the same thing with BLM. Some people only see the bit where it's saying white people you have to feel sorry for black people. They miss the psychological impact on black people, a kind of terrorism, terrorising them exploiting them psychologically and their racial fear of racism with fake reports of racist police brutality against them.

There's often the failure for people to evaluate absolutely everything from every angle and why wouldn't there be? We're only evolved to have as much as we need which is to be able to see things from our position and our viewpoint.

Though it's not obvious Jews themselves are among the most heavily targeted with this kind of psychological manipulation and exploitation. I mean why do I need to care about being a Nazi? I'm not a German. We smashed them to smithereens. We rapes a million of their women and carpet bombed their cities. Psychologically they really mean very little to us. It's a bit of a joke to bring up archaic Nazis a bit like it would be saying that Vikings are real and we have to fight the threat of their return in everything we do. The psychological manipulation of black people vote for us or the police will get you or Jews vote for us or the Nazis will get you is really just stupid.

People also have the right to make bad criticisms as well. At least up until a certain point until it's actionable so long as it's the subject to review, debate, criticism and rejection or acceptance without having to resort to force over discourse.

Traditionally in social encounters the first thing each party would do is reveal each of their assumptions and stereotypes about each other and just get it out in the open up front. Say if it's like that or not, have a laugh about it then get on with business.

People don't realise that anti-defamation really means anti-blasphemy and things like the ADL are an anti 1A organisation from inception. The problem is that even anti-defamation isn't necessarily a good thing. It very much depends on the venue, the error or potential error and the realistic implications. There is an odd effect where if you deny your opponent battle you deny yourself victory.

People get things wrong all the time about absolutely everything and while it's an important battle to fight that the moment your tool is purely one of authority and not trial by fire then you revoke your legitimate right to authority. Have an arena, but get rid of the fighters and merely keep the guy who announced the victor.

There aren't always single reasons for it. Sometimes Jews are racist just like everyone else is and have a natural tendency to hire those like them. It's a human tendency in general to associate with those you have common ground with, speak the same language, have the same references to draw from, follow similar codes, etc. Less impediment, more stream line.

In some cases it's because people assume everyone with a German/Jewish name is Jewish or follow a one drop rule not realising there are major cities with a significant founder effect of Germans in the USA and Jews as well that represent the hiring pool and Jews have long been well versus in advanced society, literacy, education, etc while Europe proper (not the Mediterranean, white Europe, the basin of France, Germany through Russia, Britain, Ireland, Scandinavia, etc) was a backwater being poked and prodded by the Romans still emerging from cataclysm due to huge turmoil in the shifting of terrain and biomes while also having enough vibrant land popping out from under the ice and snow after to stave off the need for advancement.

Genetically Jews appear to have a similar suitability to civilisation and biomes as Europeans making them relatively adept though they also appear to maintain good genetic intelligence as well possibly due to strong selection in their lineage and cultural procedures (basically self selective breeding). Jews have also always had their fingers in the pie being able to offer more higher level skills from an prior experience in more advanced nations getting there first to some degree and this was further enhanced by differences in moral codes as well as various forms of relativism (if you're a muslim you can't gamble but if you have westerners facilitate them gambling among each other and charge a service fee). They've got their foot in the door so to speak.

These details are really academic because what matters is in those positions anyone can be a problem. However you may need to approach it slightly differently for how human folly might play out for each group which each has its base cultural operating installed and identity format.

People have a simplistic view of Jews playing around with others using things like the Holocaust to always get the sympathy vote but that's only a small portion of reality that sometimes happens. It's the same thing with BLM. Some people only see the bit where it's saying white people you have to feel sorry for black people. They miss the psychological impact on black people, a kind of terrorism, terrorising them exploiting them psychologically and their racial fear of racism with fake reports of racist police brutality against them.

There's often the failure for people to evaluate absolutely everything from every angle and why wouldn't there be? We're only evolved to have as much as we need which is to be able to see things from our position and our viewpoint.

Though it's not obvious Jews themselves are among the most heavily targeted with this kind of psychological manipulation and exploitation. I mean why do I need to care about being a Nazi? I'm not a German. We smashed them to smithereens. We rapes a million of their women and carpet bombed their cities. Psychologically they really mean very little to us. It's a bit of a joke to bring up archaic Nazis a bit like it would be saying that Vikings are real and we have to fight the threat of their return in everything we do. The psychological manipulation of black people vote for us or the police will get you or Jews vote for us or the Nazis will get you is really just stupid.