Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES Front All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The BBC used a loop hole to achieve that. Still fucking disgusting. It should have been closed and the BBC should have been smacked down anyway for even having the motive to do that in the first place.

It is however absolutely disgusting that the law isn't being enforced and it is being manipulated in every way imaginable to exclusively serve the needs of black supremacists.

Part of this however is also on the people not reacting or being litigious when they should be. A defeatist attitude is one way to lull people into surrender.

The BBC at this point would best be axed. It's been institutionally racist in favour of black people for a long time now. There's a whole category of porn whose namesake is in honour of the BBC's cuckery, Big Black Cock.

A lot of white people don't seem to realise they're protected from discrimination and that they can sue. It's so untapped and is being allowed to grow to the point that companies are being publicly racist against whites that if I were studying law and had enough to invest in myself I'd set up a law firm and a charity dedicated to securing racial justice for white people.

These all exist for every other race and they pump millions into these charities and having lawyers on retainer but it doesn't exist for white people. If you white: Either you're super rich and not bothered or you can't afford equal access to legal recourse.

If you're any other race you just phone a charity or one of many not for profit organisations.

Most people assume that if you're white you're not qualified for any protection from racism because it's believed that white people don't suffer from racism. That's not actually what the law says. It's like when lawyers try to find people that had an accident to help them sue. Sometimes they didn't know they could or didn't know how and needed assistance.

At this point we're talking tens or hundreds of millions in unclaimed damages and growing. Any entrepreneurial start up law firm would be all over that. When there's millions and millions in the making screw controversy just make sure it's an independent venture and not tied in with any other business ventures.

Companies are also completely naked. They're so obsessed with fear of a lawsuit from anyone other than straight white males they're making no effort to indemnify themselves from that group at all. Given how large the group is consider that for example the size of class action lawsuits is through the roof.

257 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

The BBC used a loop hole to achieve that. Still fucking disgusting. It should have been closed and the BBC should have been smacked down anyway for even having the motive to do that in the first place.

It is however absolutely disgusting that the law isn't being enforced and it is being manipulated in every way imaginable to exclusively serve the needs of black supremacists.

Part of this however is also on the people not reacting or being litigious when they should be. A defeatist attitude is one way to lull people into surrender.

The BBC at this point would best be axed. It's been institutionally racist in favour of black people for a long time now. There's a whole category of porn whose namesake is in honour of the BBC's cuckery, Big Black Cock.

A lot of white people don't seem to realise they're protected from discrimination and that they can sue. It's so untapped and is being allowed to grow to the point that companies are being publicly racist against whites that if I were studying law and had enough to invest in myself I'd set up a law firm and a charity dedicated to securing racial justice for white people.

These all exist for every other race and they pump millions into these charities and having lawyers on retainer but it doesn't exist for white people. If you white: Either you're super rich and not bothered or you can't afford equal access to legal recourse.

If you're any other race you just phone a charity or one of many not for profit organisations.

Most people assume that if you're white you're not qualified for any protection from racism because it's believed that white people don't suffer from racism. That's not actually what the law says. It's like when lawyers try to find people that had an accident to help them sue. Sometimes they didn't know they could or didn't know how and needed assistance.

At this point we're talking tens or hundreds of millions in unclaimed damages and growing. Any entrepreneurial start up law firm would be all over that. When there's millions and millions in the making screw controversy just make sure it's an independent venture and not tied in with any other business ventures.

257 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

The BBC used a loop hole to achieve that. Still fucking disgusting. It should have been closed and the BBC should have been smacked down anyway for even having the motive to do that in the first place.

It is however absolutely disgusting that the law isn't being enforced and it is being manipulated in every way imaginable to exclusively serve the needs of black supremacists.

Part of this however is also on the people not reacting or being litigious when they should be. A defeatist attitude is one way to lull people into surrender.

The BBC at this point would best be axed. It's been institutionally racist in favour of black people for a long time now. There's a whole category of porn whose namesake is in honour of the BBC's cuckery, Big Black Cock.

A lot of white people don't seem to realise they're protected from discrimination and that they can sue. It's so untapped and is being allowed to grow to the point that companies are being publicly racist against whites that if I were studying law and had enough to invest in myself I'd set up a law firm and a charity dedicated to securing racial justice for white people.

These all exist for every other race and they pump millions into these charities and having lawyers on retainer but it doesn't exist for white people. If you white: Either you're super rich and not bothered or you can't afford equal access to legal recourse.

If you're any other race you just phone a charity or one of many not for profit organisations.

Most people assume that if you're white you're not qualified for any protection from racism because it's believed that white people don't suffer from racism. That's not actually what the law says. It's like when lawyers try to find people that had an accident to help them sue. Sometimes they didn't know they could or didn't know how and needed assistance.

At this point we're talking tens or hundreds of millions in unclaimed damages and growing.

257 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

The BBC used a loop hole to achieve that. Still fucking disgusting. It should have been closed and the BBC should have been smacked down anyway for even having the motive to do that in the first place.

It is however absolutely disgusting that the law isn't being enforced and it is being manipulated in every way imaginable to exclusively serve the needs of black supremacists.

Part of this however is also on the people not reacting or being litigious when they should be. A defeatist attitude is one way to lull people into surrender.

The BBC at this point would best be axed. It's been institutionally racist in favour of black people for a long time now. There's a whole category of porn whose namesake is in honour of the BBC's cuckery, Big Black Cock.

A lot of white people don't seem to realise they're protected from discrimination and that they can sue. It's so untapped and is being allowed to grow to the point that companies are being publicly racist against whites that if I were studying law and had enough to invest in myself I'd set up a law firm and a charity dedicated to securing racial justice for white people.

These all exist for every other race and they pump millions into these charities and having lawyers on retainer but it doesn't exist for white people. If you white: Either you're super rich and not bothered or you can't afford equal access to legal recourse.

If you're any other race you just phone a charity or one of many not for profit organisations.

Most people assume that if you're white you're not qualified for any protection from racism because it's believed that white people don't suffer from racism. That's not actually what the law says. It's like when lawyers try to find people that had an accident to help them sue. Sometimes they didn't know they could or didn't know how and needed assistance.

257 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The BBC used a loop hole to achieve that. Still fucking disgusting. It should have been closed and the BBC should have been smacked down anyway for even having the motive to do that in the first place.

It is however absolutely disgusting that the law isn't being enforced and it is being manipulated in every way imaginable to exclusively serve the needs of black supremacists.

Part of this however is also on the people not reacting or being litigious when they should be. A defeatist attitude is one way to lull people into surrender.

The BBC at this point would best be axed. It's been institutionally racist in favour of black people for a long time now. There's a whole category of porn whose namesake is in honour of the BBC's cuckery, Big Black Cock.

A lot of white people don't seem to realise they're protected from discrimination and that they can sue. It's so untapped and is being allowed to grow to the point that companies are being publicly racist against whites that if I were studying law and had enough to invest in myself I'd set up a law firm and a charity dedicated to securing racial justice for white people.

These all exist for every other race and they pump millions into these charities and having lawyers on retainer but it doesn't exist for white people. If you white: Either you're super rich and not bothered or you can't afford equal access to legal recourse.

If you're any other race you just phone a charity or one of many not for profit organisations.

257 days ago
1 score