As far as I can tell the major decision they made was in regard to "discrimination on the basis of sex, race, or religion" where they decided that sex was decided by biology, but instead by feelings?

Also, the previous President (pp) put an immigration policy into place, outside of the scope of their powers and authority, and our glorious leader attempted to end that policy.

Somehow, pp is able to extra-legislatively create law, but GEOTUS can not terminate that policy per the Supreme Court.

In this decision the Supreme Court has taken the step from "interpreting the law", as is their mandate and power, into "Creating" the law, which is NOT their power.

Whether or not this actually "voids all of their decisions" as the Tweet claims I don't know. It would seem to me to be a violation of their office, something that should be impeachable if that term applies to a SCOTUS position?

As far as I can tell the major decision they made was in regard to "discrimination on the basis of sex, race, or religion" where they decided that sex was decided by biology, but instead by feelings?

The previous President (pp) put that policy into place, outside of the scope of their powers and authority, and our glorious leader attempted to end that policy.

Somehow, pp is able to extra-legislatively create law, but GEOTUS can not terminate that policy per the Supreme Court.

In this decision the Supreme Court has taken the step from "interpreting the law", as is their mandate and power, into "Creating" the law, which is NOT their power.

Whether or not this actually "voids all of their decisions" as the Tweet claims I don't know. It would seem to me to be a violation of their office, something that should be impeachable if that term applies to a SCOTUS position?