Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Agreed 100%. You'll never understand it because it simply never happened. Common sense tells us all as much. How do two parties switch names anyway? One at a time or both simultaneously and by agreement? Neither makes a lick of sense. One party can't do it on their own...because then everyone is from the same party. But let's imagine that one party unilaterally did. So then the other party, having been boarded as if by pirates, not only doesn't cry out in protest, but meekly decides to change its own name. To that of the pirates? Fucking preposterous!

Alternatively, the parties somehow "agreed" to swap names. The fuck? The Republicans, the party of civil rights and black congressmen, just "agrees" to take on the mantle of the Dems and their racist Ku Klux Klan. Because that sounds like a winning strategy...

Here's a crazy alternative notion. The parties simply never switched. More logical on every level, is it not? The racist party now (Dems) were the racist party then. Simple.

297 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Agreed 100%. You'll never understand it because it simply never happened. Common sense tells us all as much. How do two parties switch names anyway? One at a time or both simultaneously and by agreement? Neither makes a lick of sense. One party can't do it on their own...because then everyone is from the same party. But let's imagine that one party unilaterally did. So then the other party, having been boarded as if by pirates, not only doesn't cry out in protest, but meekly decides to change its own name. To that of the pirates? Fucking preposterous!

Alternatively, the parties somehow "agreed" to swap names. The fuck? The Republicans, the party of civil rights and black congressmen, just "agrees" to take on the mantle of the Dems and their racist Ku Klux Klan. Because that sounds like a winning strategy...

Here's a crazy alternative notion. The parties simply never switched. More logical on every level, is it not? The racist party now (Dems) were the racist party then. Simple.

297 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Agreed 100%. You'll never understand it because it simply never happened. Common sense tells us all as much. How do two parties switch names anyway? One at a time or both simultaneously and by agreement? Neither made a lick of sense. One party can't do it on their own...because then everyone is from the same party. But let's imagine that one party unilaterally did. So then the other party, having been boarded as if by pirates, not only doesn't cry out in protest, but meekly decides to change its own name. To that of the pirates? Fucking preposterous!

Alternatively, the parties somehow "agreed" to swap names. The fuck? The Republicans, the party of civil rights and black congressmen, just "agrees" to take on the mantle of the Dems and their racist Ku Klux Klan. Because that sounds like a winning strategy...

Here's a crazy alternative notion. The parties simply never switched. More logical on every level, is it not? The racist party now (Dems) were the racist party then. Simple.

297 days ago
1 score
Reason: Edited to express 100% agreement and typos.

Agreed 100%. You'll never understand it because it simply never happened. Common sense tells us all as much. How do two parties switch names anyway? One at a time or both simultaneously and by agreement? Neither makes a lick of sense. One party can't do it on their own...because then everyone is from the same party. But let's imagine that one party unilaterally did. So then the other party, having been boarded as if by pirates, not only doesn't cry out in protest, but meekly decides to change its own name. To that of the pirates? Fucking preposterous!

Alternatively, the parties somehow "agreed" to swap names. The fuck? The Republicans, the party of civil rights and black congressmen, just "agrees" to take on the mantle of the Dems and their racist Ku Klux Klan. Because that sounds like a winning strategy...

Here's a crazy alternative notion. The parties simply never switched. More logical on every level, is it not? The racist party now (Dems) were the racist party then. Simple.

297 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Agreed 100%. You'll never understand it because it simply never happened. Common sense tells us all as much. How do two parties switch names anyway? One at a time or both simultaneously and by agreement? Neither makes a lick of sense. One party can't do it on their own...because then everyone is from the same party. But let's imagine that one party unilaterally did. So then the other party, having been boarded as if by pirates, not only doesn't cry out in protest, but meekly decides to change its own name. To that of the pirates? Fucking preposterous!

Alternatively, the parties somehow "agreed" to swap names. The fuck? The Republicans, the party of civil rights and black congressmen, just "agrees" to take on the mantle of the Dems and their racist Ku Klux Klan. Because that sounds like a winning strategy...

Here's a crazy alternative notion. The parties simply never switched. More logical on every level, is it not? The racist party now (Dems) were the racist party then. Simple.

297 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Agreed 100%. You'll never understand it because it never happened. Common sense tells us all as much. How do two parties switch names anyway? One at a time or both simultaneously and by agreement? Neither makes a lick of sense. One party can't do it on their own...because then everyone is from the same party. But let's imagine that one party unilaterally did. So then the other party, having been boarded as if by pirates, not only doesn't cry out in protest, but meekly decides to change its own name. To that of the pirates? Fucking preposterous!

Alternatively, the parties somehow "agreed" to swap names. The fuck? The Republicans, the party of civil rights and black congressmen, just "agrees" to take on the mantle of the Dems and their racist Ku Klux Klan. Because that sounds like a winning strategy...

Here's a crazy alternative notion. The parties simply never switched. More logical on every level, is it not? The racist party now (Dems) were the racist party then. Simple.

297 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You'll never understand it because it never happened. Common sense tells us all as much. How do two parties switch names anyway? One at a time or both simultaneously and by agreement? Neither makes a lick of sense. One party can't do it on their own...because then everyone is from the same party. But let's imagine that one party unilaterally did. So then the other party, having been boarded as if by pirates, not only doesn't cry out in protest, but meekly decides to change its own name. To that of the pirates? Fucking preposterous!

Alternatively, the parties somehow "agreed" to swap names. The fuck? The Republicans, the party of civil rights and black congressmen, just "agrees" to take on the mantle of the Dems and their racist Ku Klux Klan. Because that sounds like a winning strategy...

Here's a crazy alternative notion. The parties simply never switched. More logical on every level, is it not? The racist party now (Dems) were the racist party then. Simple.

297 days ago
1 score