No, unless there was a "work for hire" contract, the photographer has ownership. And they are supposed to have a signed release from Trump, but maybe not since he is a public figure.

But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.

No, unless there was a "work for hire" contract, the photographer has ownership. And they are supposed to have a signed release from Trump.

But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.

No, unless there was a "work for hire" contract, the photographer has ownership. And they are supposed to have a signed release from Trump.

But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.

No, unless there was a "work for hire" contract, the photographer has ownership. But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.

No, unless there was a "work for hire" contract, the photographer has the right. But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.

No, the photographer has the right. But it is crappy of them to not allow the subject to have some use of the photo.