Lmao you’re really going to go on your high-horse and start using bigger words to make yourself at least somewhat stand a chance at being relevant in this argument while I’m typing on my phone in between sets in my workout. You really got me there. And word to the wise: some of the smartest, truly intelligent people I’ve ever met never needed to use large words to get their point across. If I really cared how I came across to you on a Donald trump forum, I’d make sure to drop all my fancy, Latin legal words. But rest assured I don’t.
Second, you’re a perfect example of theory (because you’ve never actually practiced) vs. reality. Do you realize if I took just every case I currently have pending to trial, I’d be in trial until 2025 with NO new cases. Spoiler alert: we get hundreds per day. Do you realize that every case may have 20+ witnesses to organize and force them to come to trial and schedule for every case? Have you ever had the victim of a case tell you they aren’t going to show up to trial or they’re scared and want to drop the charges or tell you they are going to lie on the witness stand despite video evidence? Have you ever had to prep a 5 year old to explain what it was like to feel her uncle’s dick in her vagina? Probably not. These things effect the strength of your case. That’s called “case evaluation” but you already know that because you know everything.
Third, to an actual substance of an argument because you realize you are not even JV in this conversation so you’ve resorted to name calling, but I’ll entertain it anyways. How fucking stupid and dense can you possibly be to say “Any plea deal where a lesser sentence is exchanged for a guilty plea is wrong.” I mean how truly fucking ignorant lol. And normally when I’m explaining these concepts to a victim or civilian witness I try to be a little more nice and understanding, but cmon we’re on the Internet. So I’ll sum it up real fast: THERE’S A REASON THERE IS A RANGE OF PUNISHMENT AND THE ABILITY TO ADD OR REMOVE ENHANCEMENTS. IT IS LITERALLY REQUIRED TO DO THE JOB. Again, you stupid mother fucker lol. You’re a one-dimensional thinker and an armchair attorney. I never talk down to people that don’t know and are genuinely curious because there’s thousands of things I don’t know as well and I wouldn’t expect anyone to know much about the law. But to be so fucking arrogant AND wrong is just humorous. You’re like the habitual felon in the jail cell with his face tattoos who’s telling his nationally recognized attorney what a good offer is and how the law works lmao. I’ve truly appreciated getting a reminder of how truly stupid the general public can be on the law, but since you clearly are arguing in bad faith I’ll end my responses here. Keep making the world a better place by repoing vehicles and posting online to get any type of meaning in your life 🤡 👌🏼 lol
Lmao you’re really going to go on your high-horse and start using bigger words to make yourself at least somewhat stand a chance at being relevant in this argument while I’m typing on my phone in between sets in my workout. You really got me there. And word to the wise: some of the smartest, truly intelligent people I’ve ever met never needed to use large words to get their point across. If I really cared how I came across to you on a Donald trump forum, I’d make sure to drop all my fancy, Latin legal words. But rest assured I don’t.
Second, you’re a perfect example of theory (because you’ve never actually practiced) vs. reality. Do you realize if I took just every case I currently have pending to trial, I’d be in trial until 2025 with NO new cases. Spoiler alert: we get hundreds per day. Do you realize that every case may have 20+ witnesses to organize and force them to come to trial and schedule for every case? Have you ever had the victim of a case tell you they aren’t going to show up to trial or they’re scared and want to drop the charges or tell you they are going to lie on the witness stand despite video evidence? Have you ever had to prep a 5 year old to explain what it was like to feel her uncle’s dick in her vagina? Probably not. These things effect the strength of your case. That’s called “case evaluation” but you already know that because you know everything.
Third, to an actual substance of an argument because you realize you are not even JV in this conversation so you’ve resorted to name calling, but I’ll entertain it anyways. How fucking stupid and dense can you possibly be to say “Any plea deal where a lesser sentence is exchanged for a guilty plea is wrong.” I mean how truly fucking ignorant lol. And normally when I’m explaining these concepts to a victim or civilian witness I try to be a little more nice and understanding, but cmon we’re on the Internet. So I’ll sum it up real fast: THERE’S A REASON THERE IS A RANGE OF PUNISHMENT AND THE ABILITY TO ADD OR REMOVE ENHANCEMENTS. IT IS LITERALLY REQUIRED TO DO THE JOB. Again, you stupid mother fucker lol. You’re a one-dimensional thinker and an armchair attorney. I never talk down to people that don’t know and are genuinely curious because there’s thousands of things I don’t know as well and I wouldn’t expect anyone to know much about the law. But to be so fucking arrogant AND wrong is just humorous. You’re like the habitual felon in the jail cell with his face tattoos who’s telling his nationally recognized attorney what a good offer is and how the law works lmao. I’ve truly appreciated getting a reminder of how truly stupid the general public can be on the law, but since you clearly are arguing in bad faith I’ll end my responses here. Keep making the world a better place by repoing vehicles and posting online to get any type of meaning in your life 👌🏼 lol
Lmao you’re really going to go on your high-horse and start using bigger words to make yourself at least somewhat stand a chance at being relevant in this argument while I’m typing on my phone in between sets in my workout. You really got me there. And word to the wise: some of the smartest, truly intelligent people I’ve ever met never needed to use large words to get their point across. If I really cared how I came across to you on a Donald trump forum, I’d make sure to drop all my fancy, Latin legal words. But rest assured I don’t.
Second, to an actual substance of an argument because you realize you are not even JV in this conversation so you’ve resorted to name calling, but I’ll entertain it anyways. How fucking stupid and dense can you possibly be to say “Any plea deal where a lesser sentence is exchanged for a guilty plea is wrong.” I mean how truly fucking ignorant lol. And normally when I’m explaining these concepts to a victim or civilian witness I try to be a little more nice and understanding, but cmon we’re on the Internet. So I’ll sum it up real fast: THERE’S A REASON THERE IS A RANGE OF PUNISHMENT AND THE ABILITY TO ADD OR REMOVE ENHANCEMENTS. IT IS LITERALLY REQUIRED TO DO THE JOB. Again, you stupid mother fucker lol. You’re a one-dimensional thinker and an armchair attorney. I never talk down to people that don’t know and are genuinely curious because there’s thousands of things I don’t know as well and I wouldn’t expect anyone to know much about the law. But to be so fucking arrogant AND wrong is just humorous. You’re like the habitual felon in the jail cell with his face tattoos who’s telling his nationally recognized attorney what a good offer is and how the law works lmao. I’ve truly appreciated getting a reminder of how truly stupid the general public can be on the law, but since you clearly are arguing in bad faith I’ll end my responses here. Keep making the world a better place by repoing vehicles and posting online to get any type of meaning in your life 👌🏼 lol