On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to differences between people, especially the roles of men/women which is counter to the marxist ideal of equality. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

Kennedy's quote: "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what, together, we can do for the freedom of man."

This is literally the opposite of the mentality today. Notice the democrats and everyone keep asking what the government can do for them? Kennedy was killed for being anti-marxist. Oswald was a self-described marxist (see his wiki). The marxist mentality is ask what your country can do for you not what you can do for yourself.

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing Consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”

If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now. The marxist ideology is pushed by mainstream media which programs people into accepting it and believing it is right. It is highly prevalent in education now and it's literally brainwashing the newer generations.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM (self-described marxist organization) are no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

One of the tactics marxists employ to gain power is this:

“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.

Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene

This is important because the aforementioned tactic is one that undermines strength. The patriarchal society we used to live in valued strength and men at a biological level also value strength. Teaching men to play the victim weakens men and goes against a man's nature but men are now taking on this strategy. This is making relationships harder because now men are a bunch of passive aggressive pussies and women don't actually want this, so women learn to dislike men who they want to be masculine and strong but our society is promoting the opposite in men.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men, which is worse for women and men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of loving men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is... All of this amounts to society's values and morals being entirely subverted and mixed up. People can't tell what is good and what is evil anymore because they're too busy worshiping equality. This leads to immoral behavior and people hurting other people because they fundamentally do not understand what the proper way to behave is anymore and this is by design by marxism because if people accepted what was truly good then the entire concept of marxism would fail because it is inherently unjust.

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to differences between people, especially the roles of men/women which is counter to the marxist ideal of equality. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

Kennedy's quote: "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what, together, we can do for the freedom of man."

This is literally the opposite of the mentality today. Notice the democrats and everyone keep asking what the government can do for them? Kennedy was killed for being anti-marxist. Oswald was a self-described marxist (see his wiki). The marxist mentality is ask what your counter can do for you not what you can do for yourself.

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing Consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”

If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now. The marxist ideology is pushed by mainstream media which programs people into accepting it and believing it is right. It is highly prevalent in education now and it's literally brainwashing the newer generations.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM (self-described marxist organization) are no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

One of the tactics marxists employ to gain power is this:

“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.

Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene

This is important because the aforementioned tactic is one that undermines strength. The patriarchal society we used to live in valued strength and men at a biological level also value strength. Teaching men to play the victim weakens men and goes against a man's nature but men are now taking on this strategy. This is making relationships harder because now men are a bunch of passive aggressive pussies and women don't actually want this, so women learn to dislike men who they want to be masculine and strong but our society is promoting the opposite in men.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men, which is worse for women and men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of loving men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is... All of this amounts to society's values and morals being entirely subverted and mixed up. People can't tell what is good and what is evil anymore because they're too busy worshiping equality. This leads to immoral behavior and people hurting other people because they fundamentally do not understand what the proper way to behave is anymore and this is by design by marxism because if people accepted what was truly good then the entire concept of marxism would fail because it is inherently unjust.

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to differences between people, especially the roles of men/women which is counter to the marxist ideal of equality. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing Consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”

If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now. The marxist ideology is pushed by mainstream media which programs people into accepting it and believing it is right. It is highly prevalent in education now and it's literally brainwashing the newer generations.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM (self-described marxist organization) are no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

One of the tactics marxists employ to gain power is this:

“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.

Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene

This is important because the aforementioned tactic is one that undermines strength. The patriarchal society we used to live in valued strength and men at a biological level also value strength. Teaching men to play the victim weakens men and goes against a man's nature but men are now taking on this strategy. This is making relationships harder because now men are a bunch of passive aggressive pussies and women don't actually want this, so women learn to dislike men who they want to be masculine and strong but our society is promoting the opposite in men.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men, which is worse for women and men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of loving men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is... All of this amounts to society's values and morals being entirely subverted and mixed up. People can't tell what is good and what is evil anymore because they're too busy worshiping equality. This leads to immoral behavior and people hurting other people because they fundamentally do not understand what the proper way to behave is anymore and this is by design by marxism because if people accepted what was truly good then the entire concept of marxism would fail because it is inherently unjust.

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to differences between people, especially the roles of men/women which is counter to the marxist ideal of equality. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing Consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”

If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now. The marxist ideology is pushed by mainstream media which programs people into accepting it and believing it is right. It is highly prevalent in education now and it's literally brainwashing the newer generations.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM (self-described marxist organization) are no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

One of the tactics marxists employ to gain power is this:

“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.

Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene

This is important because the aforementioned tactic is one that undermines strength. The patriarchal society we used to live in valued strength and men at a biological level also value strength. Teaching men to play the victim weakens men and goes against a man's nature but men are now taking on this strategy. This is making relationships harder because now men are a bunch of passive aggressive pussies and women don't actually want this, so women learn to dislike men who they want to be masculine and strong but our society is promoting the opposite in men.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men, which is worse for women and men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of loving men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is... All of this amounts to society's values and morals being entirely subverted and mixed up. People can't tell what is good and what is evil anymore because they're too busy worshiping equality. This leads to immoral behavior and people hurting other people because they fundamentally do not understand what the proper way to behave is anymore and this is by design by marxism because if people accepted what was truly good then the entire concept of marxism would fail.

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to differences between people, especially the roles of men/women which is counter to the marxist ideal of equality. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing Consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”

If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now. The marxist ideology is pushed by mainstream media which programs people into accepting it and believing it is right. It is highly prevalent in education now and it's literally brainwashing the newer generations.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM (self-described marxist organization) are no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

One of the tactics marxists employ to gain power is this:

“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.

Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene

This is important because the aforementioned tactic is one that undermines strength. The patriarchal society we used to live in valued strength and men at a biological level also value strength. Teaching men to play the victim weakens men and goes against a man's nature but men are now taking on this strategy. This is making relationships harder because now men are a bunch of passive aggressive pussies and women don't actually want this, so women learn to dislike men who they want to be masculine and strong but our society is promoting the opposite in men.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men, which is worse for women and men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of loving men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is... All of this amounts to society's values and morals being entirely subverted and mixed up. People can't tell what is good and what is evil anymore because they're too busy worshiping equality. This leads to immoral behavior and people hurting other people because they fundamentally do not understand what the proper way to behave is anymore.

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to differences between people, especially the roles of men/women which is counter to the marxist ideal of equality. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing Consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”

If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now. The marxist ideology is pushed by mainstream media which programs people into accepting it and believing it is right. It is highly prevalent in education now and it's literally brainwashing the newer generations.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM (self-described marxist organization) are no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

One of the tactics marxists employ to gain power is this:

“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.

Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene

This is important because the aforementioned tactic is one that undermines strength. The patriarchal society we used to live in valued strength and men at a biological level also value strength. Teaching men to play the victim weakens men and goes against a man's nature but men are now taking on this strategy. This is making relationships harder because now men are a bunch of passive aggressive pussies and women don't actually want this, so women learn to dislike men who they want to be masculine and strong but our society is promoting the opposite in men.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men, which is worse for women and men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of loving men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really... All of this amounts to society's values and morals being entirely subverted and mixed up. People can't tell what is good and what is evil anymore because they're too busy worshiping equality. This leads to immoral behavior and people hurting other people because they fundamentally do not understand what the proper way to behave is anymore.

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to differences between people, especially the roles of men/women which is counter to the marxist ideal of equality. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing Consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.”

If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now. The marxist ideology is pushed by mainstream media which programs people into accepting it and believing it is right. It is highly prevalent in education now and it's literally brainwashing the newer generations.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM (self-described marxist organization) are no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

One of the tactics marxists employ to gain power is this:

“To some people the notion of consciously playing power games – no matter how indirect--seems evil, asocial, a relic of the past. They believe they can opt out of the game by behaving in ways that have nothing to do with power. You must beware of such people, for while they express such opinions outwardly, they are often among the most adept players at power. They utilize strategies that cleverly disguise the nature of the manipulation involved. These types, for example, will often display their weakness and lack of power as a kind of moral virtue. But true powerlessness, without any motive of self-interest, would not publicize its weakness to gain sympathy or respect. Making a show of one’s weakness is actually a very effective strategy, subtle and deceptive, in the game of power.

Another strategy of the supposed nonplayer is to demand equality in every area of life. Everyone must be treated alike, whatever their status and strength. But if to avoid the taint of power, you attempt to treat everyone equally and fairly, you will confront the problem that some people do certain things better than others. Treating everyone equally means ignoring their differences, elevating the less skillful and suppressing those who excel. Again, many of those who behave this way are actually deploying another power strategy, redistributing people’s rewards in a way that they determine.” – Robert Greene

This is important because the aforementioned tactic is one that undermines strength. The patriarchal society we used to live in valued strength and men at a biological level also value strength. Teaching men to play the victim weakens men and goes against a man's nature but men are now taking on this strategy. This is making relationships harder because now men are a bunch of passive aggressive pussies and women don't actually want this, so women learn to dislike men who they want to be masculine and strong but our society is promoting the opposite in men.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men, which is worse for women and men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of loving men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is...

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (bringing it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to sexism and is counter to the marxist ideal of equality since christian morality promotes inequality between men and women. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.” If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

Almost all problems in the modern world can be linked to this marxist ideology taking over the mainstream. It is now highly prevalent in education and media.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of living men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is...

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to literally every area of life. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (being it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to sexism and is counter to the marxist ideal of equality since christian morality promotes inequality between men and women. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.” If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

Almost all problems in the modern world can be linked to this marxist ideology taking over the mainstream. It is now highly prevalent in education and media.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of living men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is...

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war to relationships. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every facet of life. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (being it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to sexism and is counter to the marxist ideal of equality since christian morality promotes inequality between men and women. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.” If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

Almost all problems in the modern world can be linked to this marxist ideology taking over the mainstream. It is now highly prevalent in education and media.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of living men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is...

On the marxism topic. You could replace marxism with another word to represent the mentality/thinking/ideology/cult but marxism seems to be the most appropriate word for it.

It's people who place equality above justice. Marx's famous slogan "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is fundamentally unjust because a person's allocation of resources should be based on their ability not their need. The left embodies Marx's slogan and continue to push the boundaries of what "need" is. At first need was simply food and shelter, then it's education, healthcare, internet, smartphones, basic incomes, etc...

The fundamental issue with the left is that the left promotes unjust equality without recognizing that just inequality is a good thing. Their ideology leads to inversions of good and evil. Instead of recognizing that an athletic person of a healthy weight is better than a fat person in regards of their body, they try to push the concept of "equality" on both by bringing down the healthy person (unreal expectations leading to the promotion of anxiety and depression in others) and propping up the fat person (fat acceptance). They cannot accept the inequality because to them equality is the ultimate good but in doing so they resort to unjust actions. Attacking the healthy person who put in effort and dedication to get a good body is unjust toward the healthy person and true justice would be appreciating the hard-work and dedication the person put in. On the flip side by accepting the lazy fat person and making excuses for them, they are unjustly attributing appreciation to someone who doesn't deserve it.

This happens in every area of life from the race war. Unjustly propping up criminal black people while unjustly tearing down well-behaving white people to literally every facet of life. These leftists are so concerned with equality that they do not understand justice and do not realize that they are creating an unjust society. Equality on its own is not inherently good. Justice is inherently good. Just inequality is good and unjust equality is bad.

The difficulty between men and women started with the feminist movement that sought to vilify masculinity (being it down) while unjustly propping up women who didn't deserve it purely to bring about equality. We're living through the consequences of this now. Further to that as well, Christian morality has been under attack by marxists as well because Christian morality is tied to sexism and is counter to the marxist ideal of equality since christian morality promotes inequality between men and women. Anything that promotes inequality, even the just kind, is attacked by marxists.

Here's a video of a guy who describes what has gone on to people's thinking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1EA2ohrt5Q&t=652s

I'm sure you've heard of McCarthy as well? Was he just a conspiracy theorist or was he perhaps onto something? Have you heard of Operation Mockingbird? Even prominent leftists like Noam Chompsy discusses how mainstream media programs people in his book Manufacturing consent.

Here's a quote by Thomas Jefferson: "Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.” If the media was a problem then, just imagine how out of control it is now.

You can trace back the issues of "marxist" thought all the way back to the Civil Rights Movement of the late 1800s and women's suffrage. The tactics being employed by BLM no different than tactics the civil rights movements and women used. The decline in American society appears to have started not too long after WWII but the foundations were set in the late 1800s. One of the key moments of this decline would have been in the 60s when the supreme court said states weren't allowed to block voting based on wealth/income tax payments leading to a much larger group of people being able to vote; people who fundamentally like the idea of marxism because they see it as benefiting themselves and people who are more easily manipulated by mainstream media.

Almost all problems in the modern world can be linked to this marxist ideology taking over the mainstream. It is now highly prevalent in education and media.

Marxism is a collectivist idea because marxists require producers to producer for others. It is in competition with individualism. From a relationship dynamic perspective the issue with marxism is that women learn to rely on the state's authority instead of men. Women like strong providers but when the state gives women everything or women learn to believe the state should provide everything for them, women learn to not need men anymore. They are strong independent women who don't need no man but the reality is that these women have been taught to need the state instead of individual men. This is a collectivist mentality; a marxist one.

There is a popular book written by a feminist called: Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. The book is essentially about how men prefer women that need men to provide for them because it creates a dominant/submissive dynamic which men find attractive and makes the sex better for men but this makes the sex worse for women because it's like rape. Under a socialist government women don't need men to provide and the power dynamic is now equal so the sex is better for women. This is the ideology being promoted by people and she's not necessarily wrong in her assessment of how men like to be the providers but she's missing the fact that this was never rape to men because these men loved and cherished women for their role and she's missing the benefits of embracing femininity for women. Now she's being raped by the government who hold power over her instead, instead of empowering men to be individuals that provide for families. As I stated previously. Women are learning to be subservient to the state through socialism instead of living men and nurturing the next generation. Marxism is about ending differing gender roles because of the inequality different roles imply. They are unaware of the consequences though which is actually the destruction of love.

Trust me when I say marxism is the problem because it really is...